Search results

For what it’s worth, 922R compliance isn’t that hard if you put an extended tube on it; use a US made tube & follower, replace the buttstock and the forend with US parts to keep the parts count under 10. I got offered a M4 in a trade, but passed because the guy only put an extended tube on it...

It’s a bug, not a feature. Others have explained why.

Definitely. The meet was going to be at a gun store…I’ve been doing Armslist for at least 13 years now, and that’s where I try and do all of my meets. Always during daylight hours as well… I can only think of one time I didn’t do that; met a guy at a gas station, but…he said I’d be able to...

Sigh. If only I’d had one about 40 years ago in LA… ;)

I approve. The comp, btw, kicks butt.

Yeah, a HP dropped from that distance is gonna grenade; pieces of slide everywhere. Given, I don’t think ANY firearm would be fully functional after that (that 1911 definitely wasn’t, as the mag could not be removed or a new one inserted.

I’m not meeting someone to do a gun trade…annoying, but when they contacted me on Armslist, offered the trade, we agreed, then they set the place to meet (90 mile drive for me, and them…), and then went silent when I tried to confirm the meet yesterday (meet is supposed to be today)… Nope. I’m...

I think that was Sig when they dropped their P220 Combat (it was their entry in the aborted program to re-adopt the .45 in the early 2000’s, along with the XD45, HK45, Glock 21 and Taurus OSS) off a helicopter…hit it with a baseball bat…several other abuses.

Difference in philosophy, there. IS/Western rifleman doctrine is, mostly, based on accuracy & weapons in single-shot mode, except in certain circumstances. Russian/Eastern doctrine is, while not quite spray & pray (burst & do your worst?), it’s pretty close. This system is designed more for...

I’d love to see a modern Webley reproduction. Heck…even a S&W top-break, modernized with a rail & optics option, in .357 would be fantastic.

I know I’ve gotten 5 hulls in the air with both my M1 & M4…they are darn fast.

HK’s still making them.

Look at CZ rifles. Mauser type action on most models.

The HKCAWS. Or G11

And as for sci-fi guns… I am that guy.

Mal’s sidearm—the “Liberty Hammer”—was a Moses Bros Self Defense Engine Frontier Model B. It was made from a Taurus 85.

That, I agree with wholeheartedly. That S4 was to try out to see if I liked the platform enough to justify the real deal; it did. When I get an one, that Turk will probably go.

https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum/threads/turkenelli-m4gery.12393/ This is my experience with my AKSA S4. I got a good one, I think…it’s been out to the range a few more times, mainly run with birdshot, and it’s had no issues whatsoever. I do prefer my M1S90 Tactical over it, though. A...

They briefly made one not too long ago— the 315 Night Guard. I’d love to see them bring that back; I’ve got a 325 Night Guard in .45acp…wish I’d gotten the 386 version that they had out as well…

I’ve got a 3” 65, and I’m inclined to agree with you.