Search results

I have, and I do. I saw nothing snarky in MRODs post, just their passion about training for real world situations. The article only covered speed drills, which was also "one aspect of what should be a well-rounded regimen..." As for hanging around. There is this neat little trick here. You...

Right, that is the correct email. It lists three articles, the link for What if you shoot first? takes to this How to Shoot Faster article: WAS THE M1 GARAND THE WRONG CHOICE?, WHAT IF YOU SHOOT FIRST?, and JULIE GOLOB’S ECHELON 4.0FC.

I think some clarity is needed here. I am trying to read this favorably and infer that your statement is about the author, not MROD, because to me you both seem to be saying the same thing differently. However, the wording of your first sentence could be interpreted as being directed at MROD...

I feel like I got the bait and switch. The title in the email I received was "What if you shoot first?" I thought this was going to be about engaging/eliminating a threat by shooting first and possible legal/perception issues to be aware of, not practicing to shoot faster.

The title is a misnomer, but the article is accurate. A custom 1911 may not be needed, but the heart wants what the heart wants but gets what the wallet can afford.

Right, has The Armory Life been hacked? Who reviewed this and by Richard Johnson, seriously? Hey, don't buy our products or firearms because they won't save you, it says so right here.

What a garbage title. No tool or weapon saves anyone. They do not act autonomously. People use tools or weapons to save themselves, which requires the desire and determination to do so.

With the light and optic being removeable accessories, the price without them of this firearm (MSRP $1499.00 and mods $2735.00) is $4234.00 plus. While this did turn out very nice looking, I am with @SimonRL on this one. A budget like that is going elsewhere.

Shh, I love seeing open carry. It means no one is looking at me.

Again, a CCW article without supporting photos. Not one photo showing just how much this setup does or does not print on the writer. Every photo is a "commercial" for either the firearm, the optic, the light, or the holster. EDIT: Okay, so I watched the video and it provides what is missing...

Hadn't thought of something like that. Great description, I can picture this set up clearly. I like the idea of the off-hand having direct access to clear the cover garment and drawing cross-body with the dominant hand. This also makes drawing while seated much easier if needed. Thanks for...

This comes off as more of an opinion piece than an informative piece. While what holster you use and position you carry is personal opinion/preference this article's title "Why You Cant Carry" implies it will be informative. It does provide a historical background of the adoption of holster...

The rules clearly state, "Keep it civil and polite." Are you defending that comment as civil and polite? Is it civil and polite enough to make that comment directly to her in person? So hypothetically, you and your wife or daughter are at the gun shop or the range and someone walks up and...

@SimonRL The little boy in us gets the better of all of us sometimes, doesn't he. I'm not reporting it, but I am asking you to delete it because I am certain you are man enough to know it is the right thing to do.

Great post! I too only use, and recommend to those who ask, firearms with manual safeties. A trigger "safety" doesn't know it isn't your finger pulling the trigger if or when something else applies pressure to it.

Second guessing his decision based on the loose description of the event in this article seems short sighted. Clearly he did not feel his life was in danger, which is a requirement of self defense by any means of force. There are many other reasons as well that I must think about before...