There are two things in this article that really stood out to me, the first was this.
Consider someone walking towards you in a dimly lit parking garage. Your vehicle is off in the corner with no others nearby, yet this person continues to walk in your direction. Do we have a problem here? Perhaps, but we can’t be absolutely certain at this point. If this person continues to move in your direction and makes you feel threatened, putting a little light on the subject and issuing a challenge such as “May I help you with something?” could give you the advantage.
I worked as a security guard at night for several years. There's a reason they call security guards "Flashlight Cops". Whenever I lit somebody up with a flashlight in a "dimly lit parking garage" it started a fight.
I also want to be very sure to point out that I was at work. I couldn't just treat people like crap. I had to be mindful of customer service at all times and I had to be very polite when I approached these people and it
still pissed them off to no end. If you bright beam a crackhead who has evil intentions towards you you'd better be ready for the fight
Even though I was authorized to be there and acting as an agent of the property owner I had standing to stop people and ask them "What is your business here?" I have never seen a person react well to being Bright Beamed. I would be very cautious about lighting somebody up unless I was ready for a fight when I did it.
If your car is the only car on that floor of the parking garage and they're coming towards you that's really all the information you need.
Having said that in all the years that I worked nights
I almost never found myself in a low light situation in an area where people were expected to be. The only time I ever really found myself in low light conditions was if I was checking something like a construction site or when I worked at a FedEx Warehouse there were shallowed areas around the trucks where I would need a flashlight.
This brings me to the second issue I take with the article.
The collective law enforcement experience of over 150 years tells us that most police shootings take place under less-than-optimum light conditions.
How much of that is because law enforcement is required to go into dark buildings looking for criminals?
Also, how much of that 150 years of experience do we discount because they didn't have reliable electrical lighting anyway?
There was almost no place I went during my entire "career" where there was
Zero ambient light
Even here in the middle of the night there was enough spill from all the halogen lights around the tank field that I could walk around that field at night without needing a flashlight. I maybe couldn't read a book up there but if there would have been somebody standing in that field I would have seen them.
I quote Tom Givens on this subject a lot. The reason I quote him is because as far as I know he is the only person that's compiled a database of
Citizen involved shootings, not police shootings.
I am aware that he has a small database, it's only 66 incidents but 85% of those 66 happened in a
well-lit parking lot between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
Givens himself is quoted as saying that during his police career there were times when he could see his sights on his Duty gun better in the parking lot at 3:00 in the morning then in the same parking lot at 3:00 p.m. on a cloudy day.
This isn't something I've formally studied but I pay attention to the news and almost every shooting we've had the last few months in Colorado Springs happened in a gas station parking lot at night.