testtest

17 Center Mass Shots With 40cal šŸ¤Æ

Status
Not open for further replies.
I say this jokingly:
Did the cop really need 17 rounds or was this just a trigger happy moment that the cop used the excuse of needing 17 rounds to stop the threat? šŸ¤”

There's always a chance of the one off instance that someone is seemingly bulletproof. I've even seen examples where people were shot through the head with different caliber rounds and lived. This could have just been a case of unlucky shot placement.

A shot to the spine or brain is the only thing guaranteed to stop someone instantly.
 
I was hit multiple times by AK47 7.62x 39 not one round of the 4 rounds hit bone or vital organs another 5 rounds hit my equipment and gear in my rucksack & butt pack and I am alive 48 years after and I returned to duty 90 days after the incident. The guys around me were no so lucky nor were the enemy soldiers that fired on us. But if it were a center mass hit I would not be here I think of that day every day and count myself lucky I was not one of the 58,404 .
 
The full story (as linked in the article above), is linked below. After the re-telling of events, there's an excellent synopsis/overview of each of the officers actions and whether they were right, wrong, and actions that could have been done differently.

 
The full story (as linked in the article above), is linked below. After the re-telling of events, there's an excellent synopsis/overview of each of the officers actions and whether they were right, wrong, and actions that could have been done differently.

Great link, I was trying to find a body cam vid and got distracted. Squirrels......
 
I tend not to get too excited by events like this, or let it influence what I choose to carry.

Itā€™s an outlier, waaaaaay on the right side of the bell curve of defensive incidentsā€”even LE involved defensive incidents.

Yes, shifting to ā€œfailure drillā€ mode is a helpful skill, but...the head is a small, highly mobile, naturally armored target...a high percentage shot may not present itself, while a good ā€œcenter massā€ shots do...so, you take the best shot you're given.
 
I tend not to get too excited by events like this, or let it influence what I choose to carry.

Itā€™s an outlier, waaaaaay on the right side of the bell curve of defensive incidentsā€”even LE involved defensive incidents.

Yes, shifting to ā€œfailure drillā€ mode is a helpful skill, but...the head is a small, highly mobile, naturally armored target...a high percentage shot may not present itself, while a good ā€œcenter massā€ shots do...so, you take the best shot you're given.
Well spoken mister Gruber I like your thinking on the subject! šŸ˜šŸ‘
 
I tend not to get too excited by events like this, or let it influence what I choose to carry.

Itā€™s an outlier, waaaaaay on the right side of the bell curve of defensive incidentsā€”even LE involved defensive incidents.

Yes, shifting to ā€œfailure drillā€ mode is a helpful skill, but...the head is a small, highly mobile, naturally armored target...a high percentage shot may not present itself, while a good ā€œcenter massā€ shots do...so, you take the best shot you're given.
Agreed, I think stories like this are important to point out that caliber is not the only thing that matters.

Here's another example
The will to live/fight does not consider caliber.
 
I would think that facts in this story are a bit askew. One thing for sure, the ammo that was used by the officer meets the FBI standards for penetration. So the story says the officer shot rounds through his windshield at the suspect but it doesn't say how many rounds through the windshield was fired. That plays a role in bullet performance. Plus based on the bullet performance of that round, it meets the standards as many other 9mm and 45ACP rounds would. Leading me to believe the .40 round wouldn't make a difference if another round would have been used. So, that would leave me to believe the suspect was on an illegal substance, an or no vitals were hit in the qouted center mass shots. The attached article by a person that actually sees bullet wounds regularly supports the fact that the .40 was not the issue. Take a read.

 
I would think that facts in this story are a bit askew. One thing for sure, the ammo that was used by the officer meets the FBI standards for penetration. So the story says the officer shot rounds through his windshield at the suspect but it doesn't say how many rounds through the windshield was fired. That plays a role in bullet performance. Plus based on the bullet performance of that round, it meets the standards as many other 9mm and 45ACP rounds would. Leading me to believe the .40 round wouldn't make a difference if another round would have been used. So, that would leave me to believe the suspect was on an illegal substance, an or no vitals were hit in the qouted center mass shots. The attached article by a person that actually sees bullet wounds regularly supports the fact that the .40 was not the issue. Take a read.

Very good article and great information on handgun versus rifle rounds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top