You are correct, just wanted to share numbers I just found. It’s sobering.It's risen to almost 220k since March 30. And it's killed more Americans in six weeks than died in the entire Vietnam War. Almost all of us will be fine but this thing is no joke.
I come from a military family, too. Dad was airborne in Vietnam, one grandpa in the Pacific in WW2, the other was army Intel and CIA from Korea until the Shah fell in Iran. Great grandpa was shot and gassed in WW1. Several dead in the Civil War. Our family bible has a rich history. I enlisted in the USMC infantry at 19.And forgive me...but please, drop the Vietnam War reference.
I come from a military family (USN) and have huge respect for our heroes, but...just about any given flu season kills as many Americans as the Vietnam War did.
Do some research.
Where's the outrage about flu? Why don't we shut down our society and give up our rights and s#itcan our economy every year, for the flu?
I get the frustration, though. We were discussing comparisons.And forgive me...but please, drop the Vietnam War reference.
I come from a military family (USN) and have huge respect for our heroes, but...just about any given flu season kills as many Americans as the Vietnam War did.
Do some research.
Where's the outrage about flu? Why don't we shut down our society and give up our rights and s#itcan our economy every year, for the flu?
Which will cause a twofold skew in the numbers. 1) COVID deaths will be artificially increased, and 2) flu, emphysema, and other deaths will be artificially decreased.In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.”
The rich will come out on top of this afterwards for sure and the middle class will pay!But according to the CDC, we are not SUPPOSED to test all deaths that could be it.
Simply attribute it to COVID.
That's their directive. No testing or verification required.
The CDC guidelines for reporting COVID-19 deaths states:
Which will cause a twofold skew in the numbers. 1) COVID deaths will be artificially increased, and 2) flu, emphysema, and other deaths will be artificially decreased.
And while I understand the comparison to Vietnam...it is a meaningless one, because we lose that many Americans every single year, to flu. Comparisons like that using COVID, only serve to heighten the terror and the sensationalist BS surrounding this whole thing.
If you're outraged this year because of COVID deaths...where's your outrage every year, for the same number of flu deaths? And...we HAVE medicine for flu. We HAVE treatments. But we STILL lose that many Americans. So...where's THAT outrage?? Why don't we shut everything down, force people to stay home, go on unemployment, spend trillions of dollars in "stimulus" checks, and shutter their businesses...for the same number of flu deaths every year?
Is it serious? I agree, it is a serious virus.
Is shutting down Western Civilization justified for it? Trashing our economy?
I think the "cure" is worse than the virus, here...
Thank you Benstt, I agree completely.It's risen to almost 220k since March 30. And it's killed more Americans in six weeks than died in the entire Vietnam War. Almost all of us will be fine but this thing is no joke.
I can't respond to the CDC guidance with first-hand knowledge, only hearsay. My ex, before she ended our relationship because being an internist at a local level 1 hospital and dealing with the constant influx of COVID patients was consuming and crushing her, told me several times they did not list all the COVID-suspected deaths as COVID deaths and they had way more admitted COVID patients than the numbers showed becuase they couldn't test to confirm. The number will be off all over the place before this is done. Again, it's hearsay and also a small sample size but it does throw off the numbers.But according to the CDC, we are not SUPPOSED to test all deaths that could be it.
Simply attribute it to COVID.
That's their directive. No testing or verification required.
The CDC guidelines for reporting COVID-19 deaths states:
Which will cause a twofold skew in the numbers. 1) COVID deaths will be artificially increased, and 2) flu, emphysema, and other deaths will be artificially decreased.
And while I understand the comparison to Vietnam...it is a meaningless one, because we lose that many Americans every single year, to flu. Comparisons like that using COVID, only serve to heighten the terror and the sensationalist BS surrounding this whole thing.
If you're outraged this year because of COVID deaths...where's your outrage every year, for the same number of flu deaths? And...we HAVE medicine for flu. We HAVE treatments. But we STILL lose that many Americans. So...where's THAT outrage?? Why don't we shut everything down, force people to stay home, go on unemployment, spend trillions of dollars in "stimulus" checks, and shutter their businesses...for the same number of flu deaths every year?
Is it serious? I agree, it is a serious virus.
Is shutting down Western Civilization justified for it? Trashing our economy?
I think the "cure" is worse than the virus, here...
That's it exactly..... we can't keep the scare going unless we have scary numbers....... yeah,But according to the CDC, we are not SUPPOSED to test all deaths that could be it.
Simply attribute it to COVID.
That's their directive. No testing or verification required.
The CDC guidelines for reporting COVID-19 deaths states:
Which will cause a twofold skew in the numbers. 1) COVID deaths will be artificially increased, and 2) flu, emphysema, and other deaths will be artificially decreased.
And while I understand the comparison to Vietnam...it is a meaningless one, because we lose that many Americans every single year, to flu. Comparisons like that using COVID, only serve to heighten the terror and the sensationalist BS surrounding this whole thing.
If you're outraged this year because of COVID deaths...where's your outrage every year, for the same number of flu deaths? And...we HAVE medicine for flu. We HAVE treatments. But we STILL lose that many Americans. So...where's THAT outrage?? Why don't we shut everything down, force people to stay home, go on unemployment, spend trillions of dollars in "stimulus" checks, and shutter their businesses...for the same number of flu deaths every year?
Is it serious? I agree, it is a serious virus.
Is shutting down Western Civilization justified for it? Trashing our economy?
I think the "cure" is worse than the virus, here...
I think a better cure for this would have been secure the borders, mask everyone up and maintain a social distance.I can't respond to the CDC guidance with first-hand knowledge, only hearsay. My ex, before she ended our relationship because being an internist at a local level 1 hospital and dealing with the constant influx of COVID patients was consuming and crushing her, told me several times they did not list all the COVID-suspected deaths as COVID deaths and they had way more admitted COVID patients than the numbers showed becuase they couldn't test to confirm. The number will be off all over the place before this is done. Again, it's hearsay and also a small sample size but it does throw off the numbers.
I'm conflicted regarding our measures to deal with the disease. Per Johns Hopkins Medicine, the high end of flu deaths in the U.S. is around 61,000 per year. (https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/hea...ronavirus/coronavirus-disease-2019-vs-the-flu). We have that in six weeks with this new chinese virus. That makes me think extra caution is warranted. I'm also cognizant of the fact that if the measures we have taken are working then we don't really know how bad it would get if we did nothing. On the other side, crippling poverty is a huge public health danger, too, and our response is pushing a lot of people that way. I'd love to have the expertise to come to an educated conclusion on it but I don't. You might very well be right about the "cure". I simply can't argue the point either way. As Michael Osterholm put it, we're going to have to thread a rope though the eye of a needle to deal with this thing.
I wish I had saved the links, but what they are saying now is that in places that didn't lockdown that is no difference in the rate of infection versus those that did.