testtest

Another Sad Accidental Shooting

We need to stop calling these things accidents. It is criminal negligence, plain and simple. The dumbass who left a loaded gun where a child could get their hands on it deserves no sympathy. I am a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment but some people are just too stupid to have a gun.
 
We need to stop calling these things accidents. It is criminal negligence, plain and simple. The dumbass who left a loaded gun where a child could get their hands on it deserves no sympathy. I am a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment but some people are just too stupid to have a gun.
My thought too. The guy may now have all the time in the world to train and learn about guns and gun safety, but that's moot. The idiot should never be allowed to have one.
 
I'm confused, where did it say it was a revolver. I carry my EDCs loaded and ready, just pull the trigger. I wouldn't ever have a loaded gun outside of my immediate control which would've prevented this but purely speaking of a 3 year olds ability to fire a weapon, I refer back to the first sentence...
I wasn't directing my comments to this particular story, only to 3 yr olds shooting people in general. And I only used the revolver since it's easier to describe to some how it will be handled by a 3 yr old. Your point is valid in that the story did not specify a revolver, but my same logic would apply to most semi-autos as well. Even with a round in the chamber, it would be very difficult if not impossible for a 3 yr old to release a safety if any, then be able to reach the trigger with enough leverage to pull it.

Just think about how many full grown adults complained about the trigger on the Hellcat being so hard to use do to the trigger design. Many, many semi-s (not all) are similar in design ...... but none are designed for a 3 yr old's hand size and strength in my humble opinion.

Generally speaking that is !!! (y)(y)(y)
 
I wasn't directing my comments to this particular story, only to 3 yr olds shooting people in general. And I only used the revolver since it's easier to describe to some how it will be handled by a 3 yr old. Your point is valid in that the story did not specify a revolver, but my same logic would apply to most semi-autos as well. Even with a round in the chamber, it would be very difficult if not impossible for a 3 yr old to release a safety if any, then be able to reach the trigger with enough leverage to pull it.

Just think about how many full grown adults complained about the trigger on the Hellcat being so hard to use do to the trigger design. Many, many semi-s (not all) are similar in design ...... but none are designed for a 3 yr old's hand size and strength in my humble opinion.

Generally speaking that is !!! (y)(y)(y)
Why do you assume it had a safety to release?

Most striker fired autos don’t have a manual safety…and a 3-year old would likely not have much of a problem depressing a 4-6# trigger which is the norm.

You also need to stop assuming that they’d hold it like an adult would.
 
Why do you assume it had a safety to release?

Most striker fired autos don’t have a manual safety…and a 3-year old would likely not have much of a problem depressing a 4-6# trigger which is the norm.

You also need to stop assuming that they’d hold it like an adult would.
Hans, you didn't read my post carefully buddy ..... I said "..... it would be very difficult if not impossible for a 3 yr old to release a safety if any, ......" (emphasis is mine) so obviously I didn't assume any gun had a safety.

We will have to agree to disagree whether or not a typical three yr old would be able to depress a 4-6# trigger. Most 3 yr olds simply do not have the reach, the dexterity, nor the hand/finger coordination nor strength to depress a similar trigger .......... whether holding "like an adult would" or not.

I never said it was impossible, I did say it was unlikely, and especially in so many similar cases. Of course there is somewhere a 3 yr old who can do all these things. But in reality, he/she/it would be a rarity, not the typical 3 yr old.

And, I would never be so bold, or crude as to tell you that "you need to stop assuming", or that "you need to stop" anything. I will assume you are a fully grown adult and capable of making your own decisions about your actions and don't need my direction.

And lastly I'll say this .......... this post of yours seems to me to be so unlike you and/or the majority of your posts. You are generally courteous, generally knowledgeable, and rarely if ever this belligerent. With all due respect, this post seems highly unlike you. (y) :cautious:
 
well as i read it, the dad did not have a ccw permit, so to have that legally owned gun, in the car, was an illegal act.

sad situation for sure, but how to proceed with it?

sure take the gun away from the dad, but does he get it back, or the keep it from him, since he "carried" it without that permit?

prevent the dad from buying another gun...legally..??

the utmost important thing to take care of, is the child, as he most likely does not know or understand, what he has done to his mother.

that kid is going to need counseling for a long, long time. and the problem here too is, "suppressive memory" for that kid right now, until he gets older, then it comes to rear it's ugly head.
One thing I’m wondering, if the dad was the legal owner but had no permit to carry last I knew in my state you can legally transport your hand guns to and from a shooting range. If I recall there had been a few other exception. Just not sure if they still apply in my state.
am I missing something more to the story? One thing also I don’t know if what I said holds true in the state this occurred in.
 
I would speculate that in most states (prior to all of these Constitutional Carry States) that to legally transport a firearm to and from a range, said firearm is to be unloaded, secured in a locked container separate from ammunition or in a place where the occupant cannot easily retrieve the firearm. And transport is to be a direct as possible to and from the range. IMO this is just a quick overview of the possible laws
 
I would speculate that in most states (prior to all of these Constitutional Carry States) that to legally transport a firearm to and from a range, said firearm is to be unloaded, secured in a locked container separate from ammunition or in a place where the occupant cannot easily retrieve the firearm. And transport is to be a direct as possible to and from the range. IMO this is just a quick overview of the possible laws
Not Missouri. When we first got concealed carry ( 2003 I think) it became legal for anyone who isn't a prohibited person to carry a loaded gun in their vehicle. You only needed a permit to carry on your person. We didn't become a permitless ( Constitutional ) carry state until 2017.
 
One thing I’m wondering, if the dad was the legal owner but had no permit to carry last I knew in my state you can legally transport your hand guns to and from a shooting range. If I recall there had been a few other exception. Just not sure if they still apply in my state.
am I missing something more to the story? One thing also I don’t know if what I said holds true in the state this occurred in.
I would speculate that in most states (prior to all of these Constitutional Carry States) that to legally transport a firearm to and from a range, said firearm is to be unloaded, secured in a locked container separate from ammunition or in a place where the occupant cannot easily retrieve the firearm. And transport is to be a direct as possible to and from the range. IMO this is just a quick overview of the possible laws
yes, in my state, you do not need a ccw for a gun in the car to be going back and forth to a range...but in MY state, it has to be away from the driver, like in the trunk, and unloaded, and the ammo must be far away from the gun, like maybe in the back seat?

and also in MY state, one must go from the home, to the range then BACK home again...no stops in either direction, for say breakfast, lunch,. visiting granny, etc.

but this particular gun, ( had to re-read the article)and here is what it said...

“He was legally entitled to own the gun, however, he transported the weapon in a vehicle in a manner not prescribed by law,” Collins said."

so in other words, the gun was not secured?

i think the article covered it.
 
Hans, you didn't read my post carefully buddy ..... I said "..... it would be very difficult if not impossible for a 3 yr old to release a safety if any, ......" (emphasis is mine) so obviously I didn't assume any gun had a safety.

We will have to agree to disagree whether or not a typical three yr old would be able to depress a 4-6# trigger. Most 3 yr olds simply do not have the reach, the dexterity, nor the hand/finger coordination nor strength to depress a similar trigger .......... whether holding "like an adult would" or not.

I never said it was impossible, I did say it was unlikely, and especially in so many similar cases. Of course there is somewhere a 3 yr old who can do all these things. But in reality, he/she/it would be a rarity, not the typical 3 yr old.

And, I would never be so bold, or crude as to tell you that "you need to stop assuming", or that "you need to stop" anything. I will assume you are a fully grown adult and capable of making your own decisions about your actions and don't need my direction.

And lastly I'll say this .......... this post of yours seems to me to be so unlike you and/or the majority of your posts. You are generally courteous, generally knowledgeable, and rarely if ever this belligerent. With all due respect, this post seems highly unlike you. (y) :cautious:
👍👍!
 
Why do you assume it had a safety to release?

Most striker fired autos don’t have a manual safety…and a 3-year old would likely not have much of a problem depressing a 4-6# trigger which is the norm.

You also need to stop assuming that they’d hold it like an adult would.
My sentiments exactly. I have an old school Hellcat without a manual safety...
 
Makes you sick to your stomach. The details of the incident leave a lot to be desired, and don't make much sense. If the kid is in the car seat in the back, while the adults are in front, how does the child "somehow find the gun" and start playing with it. There is no explanation except the most horrible negligence by the adults in the car. Or the account given to police is false, which is my bet.

Just keep the dang gun on you. Problem solved.
 
We will have to agree to disagree whether or not a typical three yr old would be able to depress a 4-6# trigger. Most 3 yr olds simply do not have the reach, the dexterity, nor the hand/finger coordination nor strength to depress a similar trigger .......... whether holding "like an adult would" or not.
Well I'll disagree. Just recently there was a case where a woman got shot by her 2 yr old. She had him in a shopping cart with her purse next to him. In the purse was a loaded handgun (did not specify what model or style it was). The toddler pressed the trigger and shot the mother. He did not even remove it from the purse, just playing around in the purse, he was able to fire it.
 
Well I'll disagree. Just recently there was a case where a woman got shot by her 2 yr old. She had him in a shopping cart with her purse next to him. In the purse was a loaded handgun (did not specify what model or style it was). The toddler pressed the trigger and shot the mother. He did not even remove it from the purse, just playing around in the purse, he was able to fire it.
Friend, it appears you read my post rather selectively. You quoted well what I said that you could find fault with, but totally ignored the part in that same post where I said ... "I never said it was impossible, I did say it was unlikely, and especially in so many similar cases. Of course there is somewhere a 3 yr old who can do all these things. But in reality, he/she/it would be a rarity, not the typical 3 yr old." Please note the word 'typical' here.

You also seemed to follow Hans in his assertion that I had implied all handguns have a manual safety, but again you were being pretty selective because what I actually said was .... "it would be very difficult if not impossible for a 3 yr old to release a safety if any, ......" (emphasis is mine).... so obviously I didn't assume any gun had a safety.

So I guess I just have to ask, is it something I've done to upset you, or are you just a little dissatisfied with the world in general?

And BTW, like you, I too "..... have an old school Hellcat without a manual safety..." Now are we OK?

 



I’m sorry to say I could go on and on.
 
Of course you could go on and on ...... but do you truly believe everyone of those that are blamed on babies are the babies doing the shooting? Read the additional points and the people involved in any article and ask yourself if it doesn't appear as maybe, just maybe some POS adult is blaming it on that baby because the baby can't argue back. Are we all really that gullible?
 
Of course you could go on and on ...... but do you truly believe everyone of those that are blamed on babies are the babies doing the shooting? Read the additional points and the people involved in any article and ask yourself if it doesn't appear as maybe, just maybe some POS adult is blaming it on that baby because the baby can't argue back. Are we all really that gullible?
One thing to consider is that after a shooting the police dectectives will swab the suspected shooters hands for gunpowder residue. Everyone directly involved would most likely get swabbed also.

 
Back
Top