testtest

anti-tank gun seized at airport...like WTF...???

There are many reasons people, even serious collectors that are not frequent flyers simply forget to “declare” the contents in their checked luggage. Airlines with all the cutbacks to actual personnel and automated ticketing, the actual check-in of flyers more often in a rush for everyone to get through, the check-in process becomes compromised.
Check-in baggage go through a special service area, this may have been overlooked or never questioned by airline personnel or contracted baggage handler. TSA does a X-ray of all baggage regardless if it’s checked in or carryon.
Ignorance will not given a free pass.
The DOJ/DHS/TSA has a standard of what makes a device a firearm. Believe it or not, black powder revolvers are not defined as firearms but cannot be taken on board. If the item was non-operating then no harm-no foul. Many of air-soft items are flagged in check-in baggage processing. No “declared” card needed inside the carrier. So it becomes a matter of semantics between flyer and authority.

Yeah, this one made the news. There’s more to the backstory we may never know or need to know. Take it for what it’s worth - a jab from the anti-gunner representative.
TSA confiscates a lot of stuff everyday, most of it never makes the news… until it needs to.
 
It was Inert, which means it never should have made the news.............

It was dumb for the owner to think this wouldn’t happen.

There’s no way on a scan that they would know it was inert…and even if there was, there no way the agent viewing it would know what that.

It’s very much a “WTF was he thinking?” story…

(I kinda suspect that the owner was LOOKING for publicity…but then again, never underestimate the power of human stupidity)
 
I don't put it past the media to report the story in a way to contribute to a leftist anti-gun agenda....
Nothing to see here, oh wait, if we leave out the details about it being inert and being used as a prop for a trade show, well then, a reasonable person would read this and shake their head in disgust about Americans being to obsessed with guns.....
 
It was dumb for the owner to think this wouldn’t happen.

There’s no way on a scan that they would know it was inert…and even if there was, there no way the agent viewing it would know what that.

It’s very much a “WTF was he thinking?” story…

(I kinda suspect that the owner was LOOKING for publicity…but then again, never underestimate the power of human stupidity)
He can legally ship it, but as you state, he didnt follow proper procedure of notification to TSA ahead of time .

Its all on him for this royal screw up.
 
200130-A-LD787-0348.JPG

Wonder if I could sneak this through the TSA.........:unsure::unsure::unsure::unsure:
 
Back
Top