If it were three that I own, I see nothing wrong with Hans' Honorable mentioned in no particular order:
1911's - (own several 45 & 10mm (realizing 10mm is not currently a NATO or other army (as yet I know) "combat" round): Colt Gold Cup (45), Delta Elite (10) and 1918 "Black Army" (collectors item) (45); Kimber Custom A1 SS II (45); SA TRPs (45 & 6" 10mm), and RO A1 (45)).
Browning Hi-Power - (Belgium Police trade in, Aluminum frame (collectors item)
CZ75B
Honorable Mention to replace "collectors items":
Beretta 92 - (92A1, 92A3, 92X - all similar to the M9 in overall function, etc.)
Heck, even my P08 "Black Widow" Mauser Luger, or Walther P38 Luger could apply, but like the ones above, are more collector items but all do function as intended.
Except in this thread, the question was specific to handguns.When the term combat is used, I think of belt guns and military situations, so:
Combat Commander LW
Glock 21
Sig 220
Except in this thread, the question was specific to handguns.
The 1911-A1 grew from the US Army's request for an effective battle handgun.
Can't go wrong with HK or Sigs, if Glock I would go 19 or 23 though.
I have a P30 and a VP9. I really like the trigger on the VP9 although I prefer a hammer. A word of caution if you plan to replace the sights most manufacturer's while saying that their sights work for the VP9 do not take into account the cut for the new VP9 with optic ready and the rear sight does not fit correctly.I got tired of waiting for a P30L and after about 6 months i just went ahead and bought a VP9. So far i'm very impressed.
I have a P30 and a VP9. I really like the trigger on the VP9 although I prefer a hammer. A word of caution if you plan to replace the sights most manufacturer's while saying that their sights work for the VP9 do not take into account the cut for the new VP9 with optic ready and the rear sight does not fit correctly.