Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “Black Hills HoneyBadger 10mm Review” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/black-hills-honeybadger-10mm-review/.
I enjoyed the article Roy, but firearms involved not withstanding, the FBI agents involved used somewhat questionable tactics. A variety of firearms were involved, including .38 special, .357 magnum, 12 gauge shotguns and 9mm pistols. The bottom line is eight FBI agents had difficulty dealing with two bad guys.Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “Black Hills HoneyBadger 10mm Review” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/black-hills-honeybadger-10mm-review/.
There's a BIG difference between deep penetration in ballistic gel and getting through thick hide, muscle & bone on a griz and./or large animals that could attack you "if" you live in areas where they're common.
The light-weight but fast load in the article may work well on 2-legged varmits & thin-skinned 4-legged game animals, but I'll stick with hot, heavier hard-cast Buffalo Bore/Underwood loads and some other capable loads for more dangerous critters in my area.
My .02
I totally agree.Not a comment on just this article, but on many more just like it - why does every article reviewing a 10mm firearm or 10mm ammo have to start with several paragraphs recounting the entire history of it? Who cares.
...and for that matter, why are we still re-hashing why, or why not, the FBI made the decision it did 30+ years ago? It has absolutely zero bearing on anyone deciding to shoot 10mm in the year 2023.
And—at least on the 10mm subject—most of that puff is regurgitated interwebs myth.I totally agree.
Not just the history of the 10mm but every article here has about 25-50% of lead-in filler material before you get to the "real" stuff that the article is titled about.
My .02
Underwood has been selling this ammo for pretty much 10 years or so....