California leaks gun owners' names, home addresses in massive privacy breach

[shanneba]

The leaked files included the gun owner's full name, home address, date of birth, and date their concealed weapons permit was issued.
Overall, 2,891 people in Los Angeles County with standard concealed carry licenses had their personal data compromised in the leak.

California's firearms dashboard has been taken down and an error message appears when users attempt to visit the website.

California leaks gun owners' names, home addresses in massive privacy breach

 

[nmedge]

I would sue the state of California.

 

[mikep]

This was not an error.

 

[Keystone19250]

This was not an error.

Hard to prove but if they did find it was done intentionally the conciseness could be career ending.

 

[mikep]

Hard to prove but if they did find it was done intentionally the conciseness could be career ending.

It may not be that hard to prove but would the powers that be in california really look too hard?

 

[Annihilator]

What a coincidence, right after the SCOTUS struck down New York’s gun permit this week. The left will do anything that deals with guns or the 2nd amendment, I would definitely sue California

 

[jmcd]

I wonder if anyone will be held accountable.

 

[mikep]

I wonder if anyone will be held accountable.

No. No one will.

 

[dad]

Doubt anything will happen. When was the last time you read about the search for the SCOTUS leak?

 

[PhantomVOZ]

Doubt anything will happen. When was the last time you read about the search for the SCOTUS leak?

Well it led to very strong decisions for the 2A and against abortion as Roberts voted for both rulings.

 

[Philmo11]

Well it led to very strong decisions for the 2A and against abortion as Roberts voted for both rulings.

I’m not convinced Roberts didn’t just vote for them because he would have been on the losing end if he didn’t. Seems funny that as Chief Justice, he did not issue a concurring opinion while 3 other justices did. The one concurring opinion he did join was Kavanaugh’s which attempted to close the door some after Thomas and Alito kicked it wide open.

I have zero faith in Roberts. I think he is on board with whatever will cause the least public upset and by that try not to upset those that scream the most and is less interested in what’s right. In this case, he would have just found himself on the losing side. Had it been a 5-3 decision to uphold NY law, he would have jumped on that side.

Robert’s decision filed in Dobbs (which overturned Roe) was only a partial concurrence, partial dissent. He voted both sides of the isle and would have let Roe v Wade stand.

 

[Keystone19250]

No. No one will.

You honestly don’t know that for certain, many times things continue to be handled after the media moves on to reporting other news.
Hopefully someone will be held accountable.

 

[mikep]

You honestly don’t know that for certain, many times things continue to be handled after the media moves on to reporting other news.
Hopefully someone will be held accountable.

You are correct. It may get sorted out but i don’t have much confidence that it will.
I used to be a skeptic, but now i’m just a cynic.

 

[Recusant]

I used to be a skeptic, but now i’m just a cynic.

Me too!

 

[Flyboy514]

Hard to prove but if they did find it was done intentionally the conciseness could be career ending.

About as career ending as that of the clerk that leaked the SCOTUS ruling on Roe v Wade?

 

[Keystone19250]

About as career ending as that of the clerk that leaked the SCOTUS ruling on Roe v Wade?

Agreed.

 

[Recusant]

It seems to me that trying to deal with the State of California is like being nibbled to death by ducks.

 

[dad]

It seems to me that trying to deal with the State of California is like being nibbled to death by ducks.

Ok here I go again with why I love this forum Have never heard the being nibbled to death by ducks Too funny. Thank you Recusant.

 

[jmcd]

MSN

 

[mikep]

MSN

I wouldn’t be surprised if they already have one.