I think it's more of a difference that you think.
I will admit that I definitely prefer a 1911 over any other platform. They just shoot better and, well, are better.
It's not just the grip angle, though. It's also the trigger. Nothing can compare to a 1911 trigger, and for a striker fired, Glock is one of the worst. My bowl of oatmeal is less mushy. The whole plastic thing is definitely part of it, but to me that's lower on the list of gripes.
As you see in the pictures, the Glock is a few degrees different and that few degrees makes a big difference
i have several guns, from plastic to all metal. from autoloaders to revolvers..i can shoot all of them very well.
for me, i am not a "gun snob", as i enjoy all that i have.
do i like one platform over another.??
yes, i too like the 1911 platform.
but each gun has it's own fit, feel, and finish. some are battle guns, some are range guns, some are self defense guns.
Glocks (to me) serve a purpose for who ever wants a good shooting gun, and i don't speak as a "Glock fanboy".
the pic below, was when i was just starting to shoot in January of '20..as you can see by the date on the target, it was now the month of May....so only about 4-5 months of once per week practicings...
many more "hits" in center mass, wouldn't you say for a gun being the "worst" like you say of a Glock.>???
keeping in mind, i was still new at this..???...and i still needed to learn finger/trigger placement-control.....not too shabby for a newbie, wouldn't you admit.>???
and here is only 1 example of the many different 1911's that i own, and center mass hits, and then some...and, i didn't get my first 1911 until about june/july of '21....
so what i'm getting at is......
it's all in ones head that Glocks can't be shot easily, or the grip sucks, or they are not accurate, or they are cheap plastic guns....
they work, time and time again.
it's the shooters ability or lack of it, is why Glocks suck