jumpinjoe
Hellcat
There's an article in December's 2021 issue of "Guns" titled "Pig Hunting on Four Continents" that looked interesting to me since we have some pig hunters on the forum. As well, in my better hunting days I often enjoyed a good 'stalk' and shoot at a big boar. Now I typically used a 10" bbl'd Thompson Center Contender in .357 mag for hunting pigs when I went out specifically for pigs, or if I was guiding someone else to get them a big pig.
I never used anything longer then the standard 10" bull bbl of the Contender and never used a rest, although I did on occasion use a two hand hold. I just kind of figured if I was going to claim I was 'hand gun' hunting, I'd hunt with a 'hand gun' given the fact that the Contender is a pretty special 'hand gun'. And on rare occasions if I was rifle hunting deer and ran up on a good opportunity to thin the hogs, I'd do that too, with the rifle.
Now, in this magazine article some of the pigs and locations are a bit bigger, and maybe a bit meaner (I doubt that), and may require something a bit bigger than a .357 mag as well (I also doubt that), but I just have a hard time calling some of the 'hand guns' used in the article a 'HAND' gun. Some of them were identified and some were just pictured and I'm not familiar with them, but to look at the length of some of those bbl's, and the fact the shooter is using a steady rest, causes me to say "Hummmm".
In some of the pictures the bbl's on some of these things looks as long as a 16" rifle/carbine (or longer) but have a pistol grip, as well as using a rest. I don't know, but it just seems to me some of these are hard to define a 'hand gun', or hand gun hunting. I guess we all have our limitations on what qualifies and meets certain definitions, and I won't argue any of these guys are wrong in their definitions. I'm simply saying mine are a little different.
I never used anything longer then the standard 10" bull bbl of the Contender and never used a rest, although I did on occasion use a two hand hold. I just kind of figured if I was going to claim I was 'hand gun' hunting, I'd hunt with a 'hand gun' given the fact that the Contender is a pretty special 'hand gun'. And on rare occasions if I was rifle hunting deer and ran up on a good opportunity to thin the hogs, I'd do that too, with the rifle.
Now, in this magazine article some of the pigs and locations are a bit bigger, and maybe a bit meaner (I doubt that), and may require something a bit bigger than a .357 mag as well (I also doubt that), but I just have a hard time calling some of the 'hand guns' used in the article a 'HAND' gun. Some of them were identified and some were just pictured and I'm not familiar with them, but to look at the length of some of those bbl's, and the fact the shooter is using a steady rest, causes me to say "Hummmm".
In some of the pictures the bbl's on some of these things looks as long as a 16" rifle/carbine (or longer) but have a pistol grip, as well as using a rest. I don't know, but it just seems to me some of these are hard to define a 'hand gun', or hand gun hunting. I guess we all have our limitations on what qualifies and meets certain definitions, and I won't argue any of these guys are wrong in their definitions. I'm simply saying mine are a little different.