Gents, let me share a story with you. Years ago a friend stopped by my office with some .44 Magnum brass. By this time I had been handloading for decades, having started in college. He asked me to evaluate the pressure signs. I looked at the primers, thinking I knew what I was talking about, and proclaimed them safe. He said "Wrong, these tested out to over pressure proof loads." I was stunned, but as we had a ballistics lab at the office I knew he was not just teasing me. He went on the explain that this was a batch of hard primers and they were not showing the traditional pressure signs. When I asked him how often that happened, he replied "More often than you think". That was the point of his lesson...FOLLOW THE LATEST MANUAL. Do not exceed them. Lots of internet experts say you can top the listed loads and point to earlier manuals with hotter data. It is not the lawyers that tamed the loads, it was advances in recording the pressures! The old loads were too hot and not pressure tested, or not tested to the degree of accuracy we enjoy now.
Anyone with access to a modern ballistic lab I would be happy to hear any responses to the contrary. I think this deserves its own topic, now that I look at how long winded my reply was!
Eric