Bump Stocks aren't dead yet....
https://www.gunpowdermagazine.com/j...-stock-ban-how-can-ordinary-citizens-keep-up/
https://www.gunpowdermagazine.com/j...-stock-ban-how-can-ordinary-citizens-keep-up/
Great article, it's good to see that someone in the court actually thinks for themselves.Bump Stocks aren't dead yet....
https://www.gunpowdermagazine.com/j...-stock-ban-how-can-ordinary-citizens-keep-up/
I hear ya and concur, but I'd prefer having both AND a repeal of the 1968 NFA machine Gun ban (love to get me one ), and any other ban or restriction that currently exists. My feeling is that Anti 2A people are always going to hate, complain and continue to chip away all that they can to restrict and eliminate our 2A rights, regardless of what's available at our disposal. Just my take Talyn, not that I'm disagreeing with you, and able to get suppressors would be nice without having to jump through hoops.I'm not a fan of bump stocks. IMO they are a HUGE grey area regarding legality.
They are not a firearm but an accessory. They tread into NFA country by increasing the ROF function of the firearm above some subguns like the M3 Grease gun.
And they are another dagger that the anti-2A crowd throws at the 2A community as a whole.
I'd much rather have suppressors as openly legal than bump stocks.
My .02
I would hate that these haters could get it down to an either/or proposition. It would be nice if we could have both (for those that want them), and more, in my humble opinion.Not a big fan of bump stocks either, like Talyn said, I, too would rather have suppressors.
I agree, however, if you give an inch a mile will be taken.I'm not a fan of bump stocks. IMO they are a HUGE grey area regarding legality.
They are not a firearm but an accessory. They tread into NFA country by increasing the ROF function of the firearm above some subguns like the M3 Grease gun.
And they are another dagger that the anti-2A crowd throws at the 2A community as a whole.
I'd much rather have suppressors as openly legal than bump stocks.
My .02
Yes, and then you would live in my state.I agree, however, if you give an inch a mile will be taken.
Bump Stocks are gone..... did they stop?I agree, however, if you give an inch a mile will be taken.
Why not have both?I'm not a fan of bump stocks. IMO they are a HUGE grey area regarding legality.
They are not a firearm but an accessory. They tread into NFA country by increasing the ROF function of the firearm above some subguns like the M3 Grease gun.
And they are another dagger that the anti-2A crowd throws at the 2A community as a whole.
I'd much rather have suppressors as openly legal than bump stocks.
My .02
I don't think the government is going to trade off on this. They didn't exactly give anyone an option.Not a big fan of bump stocks either, like Talyn said, I, too would rather have suppressors.
This man speaks the true gospel!Bump Stocks are gone..... did they stop?
Suppressors are hard to get.... have they stopped?
Answer of course is NO. Look at how crazy it is in many states!
That just encourages them..... how far are we willing to let it go?
All that has to be done is for the citizens to allow an Executive Order to override the Constitution.but I can't understand how the government can force the people to turn in something that was once legal especially without due compensation.