I’ve really enjoyed following this thread and have learned a lot, the Kimber Rapide looks great however I’m not big on slide cut outs. To @Philmo11 and @Annihilator and anyone else what are your thoughts on the differences between 1911’s with a barrel bushing and those without such as my Emissary?
Which one is more accurate if there is a difference and which one is subject to eventual wear over the other?
I think most are inclined to agree with @Annihilator as he makes a good point. One advantage, at least for competitive shooters is the bull barrel adds weight which helps steady and mitigate recoil. It does take one part out of the equation for fitment, however, it’s pretty negligible in my opinion. It’s going to wear bushing or no bushing.My opinion, if you get a good fit with the bushing and barrel fit, very accurate, but a bull barrel like that’s on your Emissary is a very tight fit and should be very accurate for a longer period of time due to no wear between the older barrel/bushing setup. Many years ago I installed a bull barrel on my Colt 1911, personally, I prefer the bull barrel, but that’s me, my Kimber Pro Carry II has the bull barrel setup.
I prefer the bushings myself. A good smith can properly fit the bushing. One thing Springfield is good at is fitment. Most of those i tested above are pretty tight. I really have to work at getting a couple of those bushings out to clean the gun, two I had to use the barrel to pull the bushing free.
One of the main reason I prefer the bushing is that if I ever need to change the barrel, there is nothing to do on the slide. Any barrel bushing combo that has been properly fit can be dropped in and fit to length and lug.