testtest

Masters of the Air

Talyn

SAINT
Founding Member

Hanks and Spielberg’s spectacular war story is the first must-watch show of 2024


1705988191735.png


 
Looks interesting, but I don't have Apple TV.
War time planes and pilot stories are so interesting. We cranked them out and sent them up. Survival rates kind of scary. God Bless those men.
There’s a lot of cool stuff on Apple TV. I watched a Tom Hanks movie called Greyhound the other day. It was really good. Another of his movies called Finch is on there and it’s really good too.
 
I haven't seen it since I don't have Apple TV, or plan to get it.

It's getting mixed reviews from people who really know the subject matter. People who don't know the subject matter seem to be enjoying it. People who DO know the subject matter are finding major flaws. I suspect I would fall into the latter category, so I'm not going out of my way to see it. ;)

Here's a question for those of you watching it: Have they explained where the name "Bloody Hundredth" came from?
 
There’s a lot of cool stuff on Apple TV. I watched a Tom Hanks movie called Greyhound the other day. It was really good. Another of his movies called Finch is on there and it’s really good too.
I agree with you about the movie Greyhound. I was in the navy and found Greyhound to be the most realistic navy movie I’ve ever seen.

There was one weak scene where the bridge crew hesitate to follow the Captain’s order and a junior officer kind of challenges him a bit during General Quarters involving a sub chase. That just would‘t happen, and if it did heads would roll pretty much immediately. Other than that, nearly a perfect movie in my view.

Finch was good, too. Tearjerker though.
 
I just got back from my semi-monthly magazine run to Books-A-Million at the local mall. On my way out, I saw prominently displayed Masters of the Air, the book on which the miniseries is supposedly based. Took a quick look at the pictures. One I recognized instantly was B-24s on the famous Tidal Wave Ploesti mission of 1 August 1943, which I don't believe had anything to do with the 100th. Another was a pic I hadn't seen before of Francis Gabreski's famous P-47D HV*A of the 56FG (a very famous 8AF fighter unit).

So I checked the extensive index for "Tuskegee Airmen." There was exactly ONE notation (IIRC, page 230). This was part of a larger (though still brief) discussion of the US military's segregation policies in WWII. I didn't see any specific connection between the Tuskegee Airmen and the 100BG. (Supposedly, the "Red Tail" P-51s of the Tuskegee Airmen appear in two of the nine episodes of Masters of the Air. I guess we'll have to see how they work this PC detail in to what's supposed to be a TRUE story.)
 
I just got back from my semi-monthly magazine run to Books-A-Million at the local mall. On my way out, I saw prominently displayed Masters of the Air, the book on which the miniseries is supposedly based. Took a quick look at the pictures. One I recognized instantly was B-24s on the famous Tidal Wave Ploesti mission of 1 August 1943, which I don't believe had anything to do with the 100th. Another was a pic I hadn't seen before of Francis Gabreski's famous P-47D HV*A of the 56FG (a very famous 8AF fighter unit).

So I checked the extensive index for "Tuskegee Airmen." There was exactly ONE notation (IIRC, page 230). This was part of a larger (though still brief) discussion of the US military's segregation policies in WWII. I didn't see any specific connection between the Tuskegee Airmen and the 100BG. (Supposedly, the "Red Tail" P-51s of the Tuskegee Airmen appear in two of the nine episodes of Masters of the Air. I guess we'll have to see how they work this PC detail in to what's supposed to be a TRUE story.)
I’m glad you’re not my boss… just saying … 😉

“You didnt dot your “i” the same way in sentence 2, 7 and 44”
 
I’m glad you’re not my boss… just saying … 😉

“You didnt dot your “i” the same way in sentence 2, 7 and 44”
I spent my career as a book editor and tech writer. Words are important to me. They're how we think; they're how we communicate. Where language is unclear, thinking is unclear, and communication is unclear. And when communication is unclear, Bad Things can happen.
 
I spent my career as a book editor and tech writer. Words are important to me. They're how we think; they're how we communicate. Where language is unclear, thinking is unclear, and communication is unclear. And when communication is unclear, Bad Things can happen.
I noticed.
Maybe you can convince the WH to let you be Bidens editor. You’ll be swamped with work
 
Are there different ways to dot an I?
There are different ways to style words, names, phrases, and so forth. It's considered bad form to have such things styled two or more different ways in the same book. To avoid this, as book editors, we were trained to use what we called "Style Sheets." This was a three-page document, each page divided into thirds by height and width. Twenty-seven blocks, each headed by a letter in the alphabet, with one left over for numbers and "other." The idea was, when editing a book, the very first time you ran across a term you thought you'd see again and which might have two or more different ways to style, you would make a decision as to how you wanted to handle it, and note it on the Style Sheet. Next time you ran across that term, you didn't have to try to remember how to style it, you just looked at the decision you'd already made and do it the same way again. It was a VERY useful and time-saving way to do things. The Style Sheet went with the manuscript for typesetting and, later, for proofreading--it was THE BIBLE for that particular book. Seems like a complicated pain-in-the-ass way to do things, but only at first--it became very natural and very quick and almost completely prevented annoying inconsistencies from appearing in the finished book.
 
There are different ways to style words, names, phrases, and so forth. It's considered bad form to have such things styled two or more different ways in the same book. To avoid this, as book editors, we were trained to use what we called "Style Sheets." This was a three-page document, each page divided into thirds by height and width. Twenty-seven blocks, each headed by a letter in the alphabet, with one left over for numbers and "other." The idea was, when editing a book, the very first time you ran across a term you thought you'd see again and which might have two or more different ways to style, you would make a decision as to how you wanted to handle it, and note it on the Style Sheet. Next time you ran across that term, you didn't have to try to remember how to style it, you just looked at the decision you'd already made and do it the same way again. It was a VERY useful and time-saving way to do things. The Style Sheet went with the manuscript for typesetting and, later, for proofreading--it was THE BIBLE for that particular book. Seems like a complicated pain-in-the-ass way to do things, but only at first--it became very natural and very quick and almost completely prevented annoying inconsistencies from appearing in the finished book.
You clearly didn’t work in the short story department. 😎😜🙄
 
Watched the first 3 episodes last night.

Excellent series.
Wife even enjoyed them.
Looking forward to catching up viewing the next episodes later this week
 
Back
Top