never thought I'd do it

[TEXASforLIFE]

I usually don't have any dislikes of an optic when it arrives.............well this 1 is going back! 1st complaint is the battery compartment! It's difficult to install a battery without cross threading the cap, but doable. 2nd is the 2 retiles that aren't just a dot. On paper they look usable, but it's like reading microfilm without the projection/enlargement. I added a 2x up to 5x magnifier and it wasn't any help! I wanted something more than a dot (or 2) that has selectable reticles. Saving up for a sig romeo8h.

 

[Bassbob]

I've never heard of Lucid before.

 

[TEXASforLIFE]

I have a few products from them.

 

[HansGruber]

I’ve heard if then, and looked at them…I don’t think the bang is there for the buck.

 

[Bassbob]

From what I can find about them they seem to be trying to capture the lower end of the mid-grade market.

 

[nmedge]

You get what you pay for

 

[Bassbob]

You get what you pay for

Yeah, it's not really a cheap optic. Better than twice as much as a Romeo 5 and I have five of those that have been bulletproof.

 

[TEXASforLIFE]

I have the l7 (6x24) on an ar10 6.5creed that has been real good and tracks perfect along with good glass. It's been solid for a get what you pay for/budget scope. If I bought s&b or nightforce I would have around $100,000 just in optics. Big reason for not buying them! I bought a trijicon 2.5x10 for $300+ (on sale price) and it has exceptional glass. So, in conclusion it's not always what you pay for sale or not! It's more about getting a dud or not! I'm not an acog fan, but do like trijicon products.

 

[Annihilator]

It’s basically almost the same as when you go to the grocery store and see a name brand product, but next to it is the generic version of the same product that states just as good as the name brand……just how it is, like it was said, you get what you pay for, trust me, been there done that over the years