Sig Sauer P320-XTEN Comp OR 10mm 3.8" Barrel 15+1

[Lexie__M]

Sig Sauer P320-XTEN Comp OR 10mm 3.8

#html-body [data-pb-style=UVQSH4F]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll}<p>Have you ever wondered what a Sig P320 would be like if it were chambered in 10mm, well...

www.floridagunexchange.com

 

[835mag]

I’ll stick with my XDm elite 3.8. Damn that gun is ugly.

 

[KillerFord1977]

I think the same of the XD line

 

[Bassbob]

I’ll stick with my XDm elite 3.8. Damn that gun is ugly.

Ugly? I think it looks great.

 

[Bassbob]

I think the same of the XD line

I don't care too much for most of the XDs, but I like the Mod 2 4" .45 ACP. And it is very accurate.

 

[HayesGreener]

Cool

 

[Lexie__M]

I love Sig P320's with their FCU's
It gives you endless modifications to one's personal likes just like the SA Echelon with their COG's

I love my XDm Elite 3.8" 10mm however at this time I do not have interest in getting the Sig P320 xten even with their FCU's, comp but I am glad another pistol in 10mm on the market.

 

[835mag]

Ugly? I think it looks great.

I’m not sayin any plastic pistol is all that “attractive”. But I find the sig 320 line repulsive, especially with that built in comp. I guess that’s why they say beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and to each their own.

 

[HayesGreener]

The Sig is beautiful! This is ugly. Know the difference.

 

[HansGruber]

I like Sig’s comp.

Very much function over form.

 

[KillerFord1977]

I’m not sayin any plastic pistol is all that “attractive”. But I find the sig 320 line repulsive, especially with that built in comp. I guess that’s why they say beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and to each their own.

The SA XD line is just Homely. Just like Rugers .. H O M E L Y !!!

 

[HayesGreener]

Beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes all the way to the bone. HG

 

[HansGruber]

The SA XD line is just Homely. Just like Rugers .. H O M E L Y !!!

Very much agree.

The XD subcompact is one of the ugliest pistols made, imho.

 

[ddeuce22]

Very much agree.

The XD subcompact is one of the ugliest pistols made, imho.

Right up there with Hi Points.

I love my X-Ten, but the comp version is just gimmicky to me. I'll keep the full size, SIG. Nice Try.

 

[Lexie__M]

Right up there with Hi Points.

I love my X-Ten, but the comp version is just gimmicky to me. I'll keep the full size, SIG. Nice Try.

I read at other site whereas a person had both the full size sig xten and the new sig xten 3.8" comp.
In that he stated that he did not have any fails or issues and to him the comp seem to have less recoil felt than his heavier full size xten.

 

[ddeuce22]

I've had zero issues with mine and I had one of the early ones. One cut at the top of the slide hardly constitutes being a compensator, to me. I also find it hard to believe that one cut makes it shoot softer than a 1.2" longer barrel and longer/heavier slide. To each their own. I'm not buying into the hype.

 

[Hammer67]

I'm still curious how much of a performance compromise there is with the 3.8" barrel + comp.

 

[mveach99]

I just couldn't stand the 3.8" but, I absolutely love my xd-m elite 4.5 10mm. I shoot it two hand, one hand strong side, one hand weak side and it hits poa every time as long as I do my part

 

[Hammer67]

Fun fact: the P320 X-Ten Comp is 7.6" long with a 3.8" barrel. My M&P is 7.9" long, with a 4.6" barrel. For an extra 3/10 of an inch in overall length, I'll take the extra 6/10" in barrel length. The M&P is also 3oz lighter (not that I care much about that).

On the other hand, the XDM-Elite 10mm has a 3.8" barrel, same as the X-Ten Comp, but is only 6.75" length overall and 5oz lighter. Almost an inch shorter, with the same length barrel.

Congrats Sig on fitting a compact barrel into a full-size gun.

​