testtest

There Is Only One Constitution

There is only one Constitution but most of the Bill of Rights only got applied to state actions through the 14th Amendment so there is truth to saying things changed after the Civil War through the Incorporation Doctrine. A lot of the Bill of Rights only applied to federal laws before that so there has truthfully been a big change in how constitutional rights are interpreted since the 14th Amendment.
 
Last edited:
Name a constitutional right that is interpreted differently because of the 14th amendment. Not applied differently, interpreted differently.

Constitutional rights are interpreted differently all the time by different people, different supreme court justices, activist federal judges, etc.. And even if it is the state of whatever that violates your rights, it's the federal government who is in charge of making sure it doesn't happen or is rectified. Hence why Obama sent Holder to Ferguson, Missouri to make sure Michael Brown's civil rights weren't violated.

There are not 2 constitutions. This article was crafted to crap on ACB because the left is desperate. She is spotless. That's why they are glomming on to the ACA and Roe v Wade. Which these are speculations and litmus tests and have no legitimate place in advise and consent.

Like Obama said, " Elections have consequences". If the democrats had a decent candidate in 2016 it would have been a moot point, but of all people they nominate Hillary Clinton. Possibly the most disliked woman in politics. And now they nominate Joe Biden? Ha ha ha. If they spent 1/4th of the time they spent trying to impeach Trump on finding a democrat that didn't suck to nominate for POTUS they wouldn't have to resort to cheating to beat Trump. And frankly if RBG wasn't such a narcissist and would have bowed out before the 2016 election they wouldn't be facing the likelihood of a conservative Supreme Court for the next 20 years.
 
Bassbob said:
There are not 2 constitutions. This article was crafted to crap on ACB because the left is desperate. She is spotless. That's why they are glomming on to the ACA and Roe v Wade. Which these are speculations and litmus tests and have no legitimate place in advise and consent.
Click to expand...

I think you're misinterpreting the article through the title. It points out what they left thinks, but in reality the "Amendments" done after the Civil War were to support the "only" Constitution which is the original language & intent.
 
Bassbob said:
Name a constitutional right that is interpreted differently because of the 14th amendment. Not applied differently, interpreted differently.

Constitutional rights are interpreted differently all the time by different people, different supreme court justices, activist federal judges, etc.. And even if it is the state of whatever that violates your rights, it's the federal government who is in charge of making sure it doesn't happen or is rectified. Hence why Obama sent Holder to Ferguson, Missouri to make sure Michael Brown's civil rights weren't violated.

There are not 2 constitutions. This article was crafted to crap on ACB because the left is desperate. She is spotless. That's why they are glomming on to the ACA and Roe v Wade. Which these are speculations and litmus tests and have no legitimate place in advise and consent.

Like Obama said, " Elections have consequences". If the democrats had a decent candidate in 2016 it would have been a moot point, but of all people they nominate Hillary Clinton. Possibly the most disliked woman in politics. And now they nominate Joe Biden? Ha ha ha. If they spent 1/4th of the time they spent trying to impeach Trump on finding a democrat that didn't suck to nominate for POTUS they wouldn't have to resort to cheating to beat Trump. And frankly if RBG wasn't such a narcissist and would have bowed out before the 2016 election they wouldn't be facing the likelihood of a conservative Supreme Court for the next 20 years.
Click to expand...
Very well ☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️ Said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top