testtest

Amazon accused of 'election interference

bc22wm

Custom





Amazon has been accused of “election interference” after footage went viral on social media showing its Alexa virtual assistance giving “biased” responses to questions about Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
Video emerged on Tuesday of an American woman asking Alexa “Why should I vote for Donald Trump?”
In response, the Alexa AI states that it “cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate”.

But when asked an identical question about why the woman should “vote for Kamala Harris”, the Amazon product was full of praise for the US vice president, detailing a litany of reasons to vote for her.
“While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she is a strong candidate with a proven track record of accomplishment,” Alexa stated.
“As the first female Vice President, Harris has already broken down a major gender barrier, and her career in politics has been characterised by a commitment to progressive ideals and a focus on helping disenfranchised communities.”


Patrick Hannaford
September 4, 2024 - 4:40PM
Sky News

https://cos-rd.com/18/14383?param1=...dtIN6x6ckq9Q4OCG325OSCW1mIo_seUvYuC2a1CMNjRVA
 
Why would anyone be surprised of another tech company shilling for Dems? 95% of the media is already their propaganda arm. Polling is slanted as well since they've oversampled Democrats to a large degree.
Prices are up 20% on average, the border is still open (they say closed), Venezuela gangs are making news, etc. etc. etc. I'm definitely not voting for the Kommie Kackler.
 
i saw this on 3 news stations this morning
the one line that got me
was the harris is woman of color who has risen to .......
what a load of bologna loaded with salmonella
She’s there precisely BECAUSE of her sex and skin color. A Caucasian male with her brains and credentials wouldn’t have a snowballs chance of even getting “close” to becoming their pick.
 
Hmmm. Just tired it on 3 devices in my house, said the same thing for both candidates. "I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate”. Even had my daughter try wondering if it worked on a female voice for Harris, but no change
 





Amazon has been accused of “election interference” after footage went viral on social media showing its Alexa virtual assistance giving “biased” responses to questions about Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
Video emerged on Tuesday of an American woman asking Alexa “Why should I vote for Donald Trump?”
In response, the Alexa AI states that it “cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate”.

But when asked an identical question about why the woman should “vote for Kamala Harris”, the Amazon product was full of praise for the US vice president, detailing a litany of reasons to vote for her.
“While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she is a strong candidate with a proven track record of accomplishment,” Alexa stated.
“As the first female Vice President, Harris has already broken down a major gender barrier, and her career in politics has been characterised by a commitment to progressive ideals and a focus on helping disenfranchised communities.”


Patrick Hannaford
September 4, 2024 - 4:40PM
Sky News

https://cos-rd.com/18/14383?param1=...dtIN6x6ckq9Q4OCG325OSCW1mIo_seUvYuC2a1CMNjRVA
I actually saw the/a Tic-Tok video of that. Disgraceful!
 
Has anyone actually tried this. It shoots to the top of the sounds-like-bs meter, especially since Amazon would have to start paying taxes under a Harris administration.

I only have Google.
 
IMG_2098.gif
 
Has anyone actually tried this. It shoots to the top of the sounds-like-bs meter, especially since Amazon would have to start paying taxes under a Harris administration.

I only have Google.
It was true.
Amazon fixed it after folks cried foul and it made the news headlines.

Your propaganda media didn't cover it, but there are videos of it
 
Sounds kinda racist there big fella.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Want to add the cue words of Hilary as well.

Biden Harris came out and explocitely said they were filling their administration based on race.

Ketani Jackson was chosen solely on color. Biden said it when he was picking a justice . He said it when picking other posts in his administration. Fact of record.

Harris and biden threw every regulation on race, color and creed out the window and picked soley on race.
 
She absolutely was chosen based on her sex and skin color. She sure as hell wasn't chosen based on her popularity or electability. She was the first one to drop out and had less than 2% in the primary. The truth is not racist.
"A Caucasian male with her brains and credentials wouldn’t have a snowballs chance of even getting “close” to becoming their pick."

She was picked because she was the vice president, who is always the heir apparent in both parties. She also has a law degree, successful decades of governance experience in statewide judicial governance, and successful service in both the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch. Her current popularity (more than Trump) disproves your only other claim. And she's smarter than either one of you mooks.

The truth is not racist. But there is no truth in that post.
 
"A Caucasian male with her brains and credentials wouldn’t have a snowballs chance of even getting “close” to becoming their pick."

She was picked because she was the vice president, who is always the heir apparent in both parties. She also has a law degree, successful decades of governance experience in statewide judicial governance, and successful service in both the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch. Her current popularity (more than Trump) disproves your only other claim. And she's smarter than either one of you mooks.

The truth is not racist. But there is no truth in that post.
She was picked by Biden to be VP for her race and sex. If she wasn't VP, no way in hell she ever gets near the presidency. And brains ? Jesus dude. Are you just parroting the BS like the DNC/media cabal or do actually believe that shite ?

And resorting to name calling ? Bad form for sure. Sure sign of a weak argument.


While we're on the topic, how the F is any of this 2A related?
 
Back
Top