Analysis: District Court Vacates ATF 80% Receiver Rule

[Talyn]

The hits just keep on coming in the lawsuits against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. ATF took their most recent L on June 30th in the case VanDerStok v. Garland in the Northern District of Texas (case number 4:22-cv-00691-O). Let’s go through this decision, what it means, and what it may signal for other issues.

Analysis: District Court Vacates ATF 80% Receiver Rule

 

[xdman]

This is also good for the Brace Ban as well.

 

[Recusant]

It's a never ending story.

 

[Jim Diamantoni]

This should help with the arm brace debacle.