testtest

Another EO by President Biden

you are right,,,,,,,,, I wouldn't have one as a gift,,, I firmly believe they are one of the most unsafe guns on the market today,, and it isn't just Glockthere are many handguns out there with no real safety on then,,,,,, and I will never own any of them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I am allowed my own opinion even if it does put your pantys in a wad,,,,,,,,,, BUT I DID NOT GET ON HERE AND SAY EVERYONE HAS TO GET RID OF THEM,,,, YOU CAN OWN WHAT MAKES YOU HAPPY AND SO CAN I,,,,,,,,,BUT IT WILL ALWAYS HAVE A MANUEL SAFETY ON IT
My panties aren't in a wad GG, quit yelling at me.

Like I said, everything ain't for everybody. Quit singling out Glock though, it makes you look like you just hate Glocks. A Glock is no less safe than an HK or any other gun without a manual safety.
 
Sure you are allowed to have an opinion here. You aren't allowed to make up your own facts and not expect to be challenged on them though. You could start by pointing out WHY Glocks are unsafe, besides the lack of an external, manual safety.
 
Sure you are allowed to have an opinion here. You aren't allowed to make up your own facts and not expect to be challenged on them though. You could start by pointing out WHY Glocks are unsafe, besides the lack of an external, manual safety.
it is a waste of time if you don't already get it
 
IMG_3282.jpeg
 
I don't own or care to own any Glocks so how exactly would I get it ?

You can't explain the reason you think Glocks are unsafe other than the safety thing ?
I will make one last post,,, maybe you will understand,,,,,,, take any gun that has a manuel safety,,, pick it up and pull the trigger,,, while the safety was on did it go off,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, no it did not,,,,,,,,,,,,, now can you say that about any of the guns out there that does not have the manuel safety
 
I will make one last post,,, maybe you will understand,,,,,,, take any gun that has a manuel safety,,, pick it up and pull the trigger,,, while the safety was on did it go off,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, no it did not,,,,,,,,,,,,, now can you say that about any of the guns out there that does not have the manuel safety
So the answer is no. No you cannot say what makes Glocks any more unsafe than any other gun without a safety.
 
So the answer is no. No you cannot say what makes Glocks any more unsafe than any other gun without a safety.
try telling that to the guy who messes up and his kid kills himself,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, you people are all the same your opinion is all that matters anyone who doesn't agree is wrong,,,,,,,, well I have had enough of the morons on this site
 
try telling that to the guy who messes up and his kid kills himself,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, you people are all the same your opinion is all that matters anyone who doesn't agree is wrong,,,,,,,, well I have had enough of the morons on this site
Wow man, you don't like glocks and that's fine. but sheesh, cool off and come back. but any loaded handgun around kids can be manipulated, safety or not. Don't leave. it's just a forum. people are different. it's good there is a variety of guns to choose from. but please don't call us Morons cause we have guns without side safeties. most of us have both types.
 
try telling that to the guy who messes up and his kid kills himself,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, you people are all the same your opinion is all that matters anyone who doesn't agree is wrong,,,,,,,, well I have had enough of the morons on this site
Okay let's recap.


You claim Glocks are one of the most unsafe firearms out there because they have no manual safety.

It's pointed out to you that most striker guns have no safety. You double down.

I ask you what about Glocks makes them less safe than any other striker gun with no safety.

You evade the question 3 times.

And I'm the moron ?



For the record, no one is questioning your opinion that you prefer a manual safety. You are not alone, even on this forum there are plenty of guys who won't carry a gun with no safety. And that's okay. It can be trained for. And as I said, everything ain't for everybody. What I think is that someone you know probably had a Glock, failed to secure it properly with kids in the house and their kid got a hold of it and did the unthinkable. If that's the case, I am truly sorry. Tragedy is no laughing matter. And certainly it is understandable that you would think all guns should have safeties. Whether that actually addresses the core issue or not, it is nevertheless understandable. You can't expect random people on a gun forum to be afflicted with your condition though. Can you understand that ? And you can't get around the fact that the Glock is not fundamentally different than most other striker guns and is not any less safe than they are. That is not an opinion, it is a fact. If you will just calm down and think about the entire conversation I'm sure you will come to the conclusion that no one here was attacking you or devaluing your opinion. The disconnect was with your facts.


I hope you stick around because this forum has a good cross section of all types of firearm enthusiasts and represents many, MANY years of experience and near limitless knowledge about things you are most likely very interested in. And it would be nice to have your experience and knowledge added to the collective. And brother, none of us is cool with NDs, especially when they involve kids.
 
try telling that to the guy who messes up and his kid kills himself,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, you people are all the same your opinion is all that matters anyone who doesn't agree is wrong,,,,,,,, well I have had enough of the morons on this site
Many a kid has been seriously injured or worse by all types of guns, usually through adult negligence, nothing to do with whether gun had manual safety or not. If a kid can pull a trigger, a kid can disengage a manual safety. That’s why adults are supposed to keep guns away from kids.

I give the folks you’ve been responding to here immense credit for their tremendous restraint. It seems you prefer manual safety guns. However you’ve yet to explain your position that a Glock without a manual safety somehow is less safe than all the other brands without manual safeties (and there are quite a few…Sig Sauer comes to mind, but many other well known and lesser brands as well).

Everyone you’re referring to as morons are far from it, at least that’s what their post history would indicate. They seem to be quite rational folk who have tried to ascertain and/or understand your immense hatred for the Glock brand over other guns that are made the exact same way.

For what it’s worth, there are significant differences of opinions on this site regularly and the vast majority of posters refrain from name calling. Just because someone disagrees with you, it doesn’t mean they are a moron. It simply means they disagree with you. Your opinions are no more absolute than those held by others. As the saying goes, “Everyone is entitled to their own opinion”. And just like there are plenty of folks who disagree with me on various topics, I’m sure there are bound to be various folks who disagree with you occasionally, though in this case it seems to me most are merely requesting clarification on your premise that Glocks are somehow less safe than all other striker fired handguns that don’t have manual safeties.

Some may even agree with you that guns without manual safeties might be less safe than those with manual safeties, though that should apply to all brands, not just Glock.
 
try telling that to the guy who messes up and his kid kills himself,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, you people are all the same your opinion is all that matters anyone who doesn't agree is wrong,,,,,,,, well I have had enough of the morons on this site
Sounds like you're blaming an inanimate object for the actions of people, and then calling anyone that disagrees with you a "moron". You wouldn't happen be a liberal politician, would you? Have a pipe, a cup of tea, cool your jets and stick around.1727630111919.png no safety on this either;) Sorry couldn't help myself.
 
Back
Top