testtest

AR Component Question

TacticalPirate said:
it's a great BCG, easy to clean, same ones they put in their 2K rifles, very reliable for rapid fire.
Click to expand...

They are apparently very difficult to keep in stock and nice and expensive. I'm planning on putting one together soon using at least upper tier BGC, FCG and barrel. No concrete decisions yet, but I was leaning towards BCM.
 
Bassbob said:
They are apparently very difficult to keep in stock and nice and expensive. I'm planning on putting one together soon using at least upper tier BGC, FCG and barrel. No concrete decisions yet, but I was leaning towards BCM.
Click to expand...
BCM and SA Saints have good ones too, they do what they need to do and will probably last.

Smith & Wesson and Sig Sauer both only use AR BCGs for whatever reason, presumably a cost saver, but who knows. Thus if you own one of the otherwise well made rifles by the two, if you want to add a Rare Breed trigger in an M&P 15 or Sig Sauer you have to buy a full auto bolt carrier.
 
TacticalPirate said:
BCM and SA Saints have good ones too, they do what they need to do and will probably last.

Smith & Wesson and Sig Sauer both only use AR BCGs for whatever reason, presumably a cost saver, but who knows. Thus if you own one of the otherwise well made rifles by the two, if you want to add a Rare Breed trigger in an M&P 15 or Sig Sauer you have to buy a full auto bolt carrier.
Click to expand...
I would only ever use full auto BCGs. I guess unless I was building a lightweight competition rifle.
 
Bassbob said:
I would only ever use full auto BCGs. I guess unless I was building a lightweight competition rifle.
Click to expand...
Cost cutting and light weight patrol rifles were probably what were in the thinking behind the M&P 15, the Sig Sauer is without excuse, those aren’t “budget” rifles and Sig Sauer already makes full auto BCG for military contracts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top