Quick clarification: I assume here that the circumstances had you “in imminent danger“ or whatever, and that your reaction was pretty much what it would’ve been had there been no malt hootch…Interesting question there, KF…
I’m gonna say it’s no issue, on the strength that you weren’t in the position of being a “public danger” or public nuisance, while inside your own home….esp. if you didn’t open the door.
To understand Cooper you have to go back to the late 1950’s and 60’s to Southern California and the Leather Slap matches folks like Jack Weaver, Thell Read Cooper and others were in.I prefer the NRA fundamental rules of gun safety. I don’t know the history to which years they were adopted versus Mr. Coopers work. I have read enough of Cooper’s material to understand that he has made a significant contribution to defense and combat shooting. I would argue that his safety fundamentals are not as a profound contribution as to his tradecraft to combat handgun and carbine techniques.
Like scholars in academia Cooper was a scholar of combat arms. We wouldn’t discredit Einstein because he was not able to conceptualize travel faster than the speed of light. Thanks to his discoveries scholars are able to advance further towards the truth.
Cooper led the evolution of combat shooters for decades and has made a significant contribution to where we are now. This leaves reflection to whether we are in fact “better” at combat shooting today versus in Cooper’s day?
Humans like to believe we are getting better over time, but this assertion has been disproven time and time again. It’s my theory that we advance our technology over time and make better hammers, and this technology forces the evolution of our training. It’s quite the opposite to what we assume.
I have also followed a training organization that has evolved to out match the threats of the modern era. While threats change their modus operandi so must our training ethos. The few applied training organizations that instruct those who have to meet these emerging threats are grinding out bits of wisdom to find better ways to do things like clear stairs and manage stoppages etc.
We become arrogant in thinking we have become superior to our forebears but the truth is most of us are riding on the shoulders of giants and we will never reach the potential that these scholars achieved by their grit and determination and a bit of passionate insanity..
If you have been drinking and have to use your firearm in self defense you have made a difficult situation more difficult. I plan on two things if I find myself in a shooting situation. 1. Insisting on pressing charges against the assailant (dead or alive!) and 2. Insisting on an alcohol / drug test. (drinking or not using or not) These 2 steps will help in any litigation that may arise.So…I disagree—depending on the individual.
Some people have a problem with alcohol, even one drink; others don’t.
Personally, I fall in the latter category.
If I go out for lunch, and choose to have A (singular, ONE) beer, and have a J-frame in my pocket…i don’t feel like it’s going to be an issue, any more than I think driving home after that one beer will be (in fact, the driving part is more likely to cause an accident exponentially more than the firearm).
Don’t take this as an endorsement of getting hammered and playing with guns, though. Or going gun shopping after a few…because that’s how you end up buying guns you really didn’t intend to…
Or going gun shopping after a few…because that’s how you end up buying guns you really didn’t intend to…
Doesn't Rule #2 conflict with the new ever popular Appendix Carry?Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “Are Lt. Col. Jeff Cooper’s Teachings Still Relevant?” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/4-rules-of-gun-safety/.