Dude, you are a walking treasure trove of knowledge.
^ Yeah.....nope.
I'm much flattered and honored, but really, I'm nowhere near. The pond that I call my pool of knowledge is both narrow and shallow.
But heck, I do try to help when I can, based on what little I know. I try to give back to the same community that's given me so much.
A lot of that post above came from my years of buying different holsters and belts and trying them out, so a lot of this just comes from money not so wisely spent. I'm a gear-hoarder, so I actually don't mind, and just roll this into a part of my hobby. Just hoping to save someone from wasting their hard-earned cash, and to offer them a few words of encouragement when that XYZ piece of the latest and greatest gear somehow just doesn't fit them in the same way.
------
Belts -
- Width
- Stiffness
- Thickness
These three characteristics interplay and are a give-take (additional considerations like stiffening inserts and/or various types of liners for the belt can also impact the interplay of these characteristics).
These not factors inherent to a "gun-belt," but rather, *_ANY_* belt.
This is the reason why there are alternatives which can serve very well as "gunbelts."
A custom leather dress belt. A climbing/rigger's belt like the Arc'teryx LEAF. A sturdy synthetic "work belt." These can all be used just as successfully for their intended purposes as they can to support the weight of a concealed-carry setup.
There's always that compromise of stiffness, width, and thickness, no matter what belt you choose - material, cost, aesthetics, etc. It's how you want to play with those three factors - based on your individual perception of everything from subjective comfort and how as well as what you usually carry - that will determine whether if any particular belt better or worse fits your individual needs.
Just because a belt is a known "gun belt" doesn't necessarily mean it'll be a good fit for you.
For example, if you wanted a very stiff synthetic belt but purchased the highly acclaimed The Wilderness 5-Stitch, you're probably not going to be a happy camper with the $50 that you'd just spent.
On the other hand, if what you're looking for is a wide, thick belt that's not too stiff, you'd likely be very happy spending just $25 for an "Amish" leather belt or Tractor Supply workbelt.
With a belt that has one or two of the factors absolutely locked-up, it can be lax in the third (or even the other two), and still be a very suitable foundation for even the biggest (weapons with a longer barrel/slide are actually easier to conceal as long as the clocking and cant are favorable) and heaviest of weapons.
Obviously, wardrobe choices will impact thickness and/or width considerations (i.e. if you wear jeans or khakis day-to-day, your belt choice may not be as limited as someone who wears off-the-shelf dress pants), but what's not immediately apparent is that stiffness can tremendously impact day-to-day comfort.
For the latter, it's easily demonstrated by searching up reviews that pit the Volund ATLAS belt versus the Ares Gear Ranger/Aegis. For example, one female shooter on the Ohioans for Concealed Carry Forums asked for specific advice on gun-belts because she wanted something that fit her manner of dress and which will not ride uncomfortably on her hips. In replying to that thread, I remembered something that Jake Sebens of Ares Gear explained to a female classmate in a high-end training class: that some's body-shape or other personal-preference issue simply makes his very, very stiff belts too uncomfortable (he graciously offered to let that student try on a demo to let her return it with no obligation, if she felt it was not for her). Towards that end, there's also men who feel that the Ares Ranger or Aegis is "too stiff" and cuts uncomfortably into their waist. This is actually one of the reasons why slightly softer/more flexible belts such as the Volund ATLAS - which "takes it down a notch" - have become so popular.
Similarly, consider that in today's AIWB-favoring atmosphere, shooters have also started to get away from super-stiff belts as they find that belts that are just a bit softer and conforms better to the holster are better able to take advantage of the gun-heel cantilevering "claw" or "wing."
Stiffness isn't the end-all and be-all. It's just one of the considerations.
Thickness of the belt is also something that can potentially cause non-compatibility with the holster's anchoring hardware. Say the J-hook or overhook of a particular make/brand is not wide enough to really capture the full thickness of your belt - guess what? on the draw, it's possible to pop the holster clean out of the pants as the J-hook slides under the belt. A spring-steel clip that seems to hold tight in everyday wear but doesn't actually physically capture the other side of the belt (i.e. the belt is too wide for the clip)? try draw under stress and see if that holster doesn't come flying out, either with your gun or separate from it. This is definitely one of those areas that end-users need to be aware of and fully test/vet before carrying the weapon as a defensive tool: if I could have a dollar for every time I've seen a holster fly off someone's waist in a beginner-level class.....
Finally, your "input" into the belt equation - how tight the belt is cinched at the waist - can also have tremendous impact on the draw.
The amount of pressure at the mouth of an IWB holster that an overlying belt exerts is obvious, but what's not so obvious is that if you don't cinch your belt enough *to you* (
regardless whether that holster is IWB and under it or OWB and over it), when you draw that gun, the holster's own level of retention will literally "hang on" to that gun until your belt's upward motion is arrested enough by the adjacent belt-loops, and only then will it allow the gun to pop free and the draw to truly start.
Don't think that this matters that much?
I didn't think so, either, until Joe Weyer at the Alliance PD Training facility put us all on Coaches Eye's 240 fps HD slow-motion, and we got to see just how much time elapsed from when our hands got on the grip of our gun, to finally when the holster let go after it starts riding up our waist....
Can't see this in your mind's eye? Lemmie put it like this:
Let's say that I'm clairvoyant, and I tell you that you're going to step out of your house today right into a showdown at the O.K. Corral-type gunfight.
What's more, I'm now going to tell you that when that clock strikes three and as you establish that master grip on your holstered pistol, I'm going to come and clamp my hand overtop yours, and I'm not going to let you start your draw for, oh, let's say a tenth of a second?
You're going to cuss me out, aren't you?
A whole tenth of a second
in a gunfight where I'm not going to let you clear leather...that's crazy, isn't it?
Yeah, it's like that, if your holster doesn't break retention *right then*.
In my limited experience, I find that to an extent, stiffness can help overcome the need to tighten the belt as much - but again, these are two issues that are very subjective in nature to begin with.
For my first low-light pistol class (May, 2011), I wore a SOE-brand 2" nylon "rigger's belt" that held two Safariland Slimline open-top dual magazine pouches (for a total of four 19-round magazines of 9x19) and a Surefire V70 holster (with Surefire Z2S-LED) on the support side, counterbalancing a Safariland 5188 STX light-bearing holster for my 4.5-inch XDm9 w/Insight M6. This belt is about as stiff as the Wilderness 5-Stitch - read: it's about as stiff as a limp wet noodle - yet, it held all that weight comfortably for me through the duration of an 8-hour course that saw us drenched literally to-the-bone from a passing thunderstorm.
The only real difference that I feel with that, in comparison to my typical setup today (Ares Gear Ranger w/3x 19-round magazines and the same 4.5-inch XDm9 in a Raven Concealment Phantom, plus a small dump pouch and a small blow-out kit), is that with the much, much stiffer Ares Gear belt, I don't need to wear it quite as tight.
But again, YMMV and all that.
-----
One final thing to keep in-mind:
There's a lot of subjectivity at play here with "concealment."
What's an "acceptable" compromise between comfort/concealment/access for me may be the same for another person, barely noticeable and absolutely comfortable to another, and yet totally unbearable or unacceptable for yet someone else. Comfort is, by definition, subjective, and it plays a -HUGE- role in civilian legal concealed carry. Similarly, what any one of us would consider to be well concealed may be considered less so by another.
There's no hard right or wrong, here.
A lot of it depends on personal preference/comfort and dress requirements.