testtest

Concealed Carry Corner: Three Tips To Make Carrying Concealed Easier

I guess its relative. Currently I pocket carry in a chest pocket on my outer coat and will be able to do so for another 4-5 months. Carrying in a fanny-pack couldn't possibly be faster. However, I have always questioned how fast one needs to draw when it comes down to it....all these guys talk about training for drawing in micro-seconds...I'm not convinced that is always necessary. Every situation is different. I just don't think that fast-draw like Clint Eastwood is realistic...
The first one to get good hits on their opponent is overwhelmingly more likely to prevail in a gun fight. The slower your ability to draw, the less likely it will be you. Bad guys generally attack by surprise with weapon in hand. You're disadvantaged from the first instant. If you get a chance to counter-ambush, you have to be fast and accurate. If you have to fumble for a few seconds to dig your gun out of a jacket pocket, it may be like not having it at all. Of course, this will not always be true, but the need for speed is not rare in self defense scenarios, as Bassbob observed.

I think most of us would be capable of a 1.5 to 2 second draw to first shot from concealment with diligent training and suitable gear. Not that anyone asked me, but if my ability and/or carry method couldn't meet that standard, I would seriously re-evaluate and make the necessary changes to make sure I could.
 
To begin with, I don't disagree at all - rather, I'm in complete alignment with your outlook, @Ranger715

But something is missing.... ;)

I think most of us would be capable of a 1.5 to 2 second draw to first shot from concealment with diligent training and suitable gear.

What's the distance-to-target and the target size, in this metric?
 
All well and good regarding quick-draw aficionados...but the only way to get live-shooting holster practice within 100 miles of me is during a class, which run $200-300 at ranges near me. No ranges I frequent allow holster drawing unless you have an instructor teaching you. Pretty expensive to get as proficient as discussed above...I will admit there may be ranges in the area I am unaware of, though...There is one about 45 miles north of me that has weekly competitions that involve holster drawing, but that is during the matches (in which I have little interest in competing).
 
All well and good regarding quick-draw aficionados...but the only way to get live-shooting holster practice within 100 miles of me is during a class, which run $200-300 at ranges near me. No ranges I frequent allow holster drawing unless you have an instructor teaching you. Pretty expensive to get as proficient as discussed above...I will admit there may be ranges in the area I am unaware of, though...There is one about 45 miles north of me that has weekly competitions that involve holster drawing, but that is during the matches (in which I have little interest in competing).


Most of us don't take classes every day. Many don't even shoot once a month ( I shoot at least once a week). You can work on your stance, draw, grip, sight picture, trigger press and follow through in your living room with an empty gun. They also have very affordable ( and fun) laser trainers.
 
^ Yup.

Dry-fire for that first-shot-out-of-holster can be done towards *excellent* effect, as long as the shooter is willing to really put in the effort.

It doesn't even have to be done with any kind of laser or otherwise interactive learning aid (e.g. airsoft).

For example, the way, way, way-underrated and hidden-gem handgun trainer Joseph Weyer of the Alliance Police Training Facility runs an exceptional, designed-for-concealed carry class called "Handgun Diagnostics," which over the past few years has been hosted by the wonderful guys at Practically Tactical.

In this class, each student's draw-strokes were filmed in HD/240 fps slow-motion using Coaches Eye, and then individually critiqued and corrected. We had close to 300 draw-strokes burned-in -in meticulous and physically harsh slow-motion- just on the first day of class, where, IIRC, only one round was live-fired. The next day, when we transitioned to live-fire after yet another morning dry session, every students' improvement from baseline was eye-popping: objectively so, as each student was broken out individually for evaluation, correction, and validation, using timed and scored metrics.

Weyer's strong belief - garnered over his many years specializing as a police handgun instructor and thus having researched that data - is that the victor of the gunfight is almost always the first to score an effective hit on the opponent.

As such, it's about both speed and accuracy as you come out of that holster.

And this actually can be worked on, dry.
 
You’re wrong on the 5 shots, for what it’s worth.

Average self defense shooting is under two rounds fired.

Also, a Glock can go off in a pocket, if it’s not in a holster. Plenty of examples of it happening.

If you pocket carry, use a holster that covers the trigger guard.
This....
 
Most of us don't take classes every day. Many don't even shoot once a month ( I shoot at least once a week). You can work on your stance, draw, grip, sight picture, trigger press and follow through in your living room with an empty gun. They also have very affordable ( and fun) laser trainers.
I soent a lot of that boring lockdown shootibg with laser cartridges. Does not replace live fire, but it sure does augment it well.
 
To begin with, I don't disagree at all - rather, I'm in complete alignment with your outlook, @Ranger715

But something is missing.... ;)



What's the distance-to-target and the target size, in this metric?
Good question. I'm not trying to be dogmatic, or tell anyone they're not good enough. Just offering my two bits. Pick what you think is reasonable. I would choose a generous human sized torso target from about 5 yards. Something like the "bowling pin" area of a Transtar II target (includes the center and head area). Get shots on the middle bits from a modest, but not too easy, distance.

To reiterate what others have pointed out, draw-to-first-shot skill can be developed to a high degree with dry fire. It should be confirmed with live fire occasionally, of course, but extensive range time is not necessarily required. At least, that has been my experience.

I use a par timer set at 1.5 seconds. I try to draw from concealment and release the trigger with my eyes focused on the front sight before or during the beep. I can tell if the sights are on target. My local club doesn't allow shooting from the draw, either, so I practice from a compressed ready when I'm there. Mechanics of the draw are practiced at home.
 

Attachments

  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    5 KB · Views: 147
All well and good regarding quick-draw aficionados...but the only way to get live-shooting holster practice within 100 miles of me is during a class, which run $200-300 at ranges near me. No ranges I frequent allow holster drawing unless you have an instructor teaching you. Pretty expensive to get as proficient as discussed above...I will admit there may be ranges in the area I am unaware of, though...There is one about 45 miles north of me that has weekly competitions that involve holster drawing, but that is during the matches (in which I have little interest in competing).

Hi,

I have no serious interest in competition either but I am interested in developing some of the skills used. When a friend invited me out to his club's weekly events I expressed my reluctance, due to my noob status, and he said not to worry about that. I was assured that it's a great bunch of guys there to have (safe) fun, help, coach, teach, learn, and otherwise enjoy each other's company. The main competition is with yourself, improving your own performance.

I would hope most local competitions are like that. It wouldn't hurt to check out your local competition. I'm trying to arrange a weekend at my friend's club. It should be quite a learning experience.

I try to do a lot of laser practice too. ;)


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
Good question. I'm not trying to be dogmatic, or tell anyone they're not good enough. Just offering my two bits. Pick what you think is reasonable. I would choose a generous human sized torso target from about 5 yards. Something like the "bowling pin" area of a Transtar II target (includes the center and head area). Get shots on the middle bits from a modest, but not too easy, distance.

To reiterate what others have pointed out, draw-to-first-shot skill can be developed to a high degree with dry fire. It should be confirmed with live fire occasionally, of course, but extensive range time is not necessarily required. At least, that has been my experience.

I use a par timer set at 1.5 seconds. I try to draw from concealment and release the trigger with my eyes focused on the front sight before or during the beep. I can tell if the sights are on target. My local club doesn't allow shooting from the draw, either, so I practice from a compressed ready when I'm there. Mechanics of the draw are practiced at home.

^ Not trying to bait anything at all - I honestly just wanted a fuller picture of the metric that you were using. :) As I'm fond of reminding anyone who asks it of me, I do not believe that metrics are fulfilled unless we have full accounting of (1) time, (2) distance, and (3) target [size]. (y)

And on a personal note, thank you for contributing to my list of range-drills. :)

And in reading your reply, the highlighted part also has me re-reading this thread a bit.....

I'm going to backtrack a little, here, as by the way I'm reading the more recent posts in this thread, I think there's a bit of divergence going on:

I’ll take that a step further.
Practice drawing quite a bit as well as where you draw.

When I first practiced drawing from the holster while seated in my vehicle, I kept hitting the steering wheel while attempting to simulate shooting out the window.
Muscle memory didnt account for an object in front of my chest.

I then took an old car out to the land and shot out the window after I got down the basics of the draw

I guess its relative. <snip> However, I have always questioned how fast one needs to draw when it comes down to it....all these guys talk about training for drawing in micro-seconds...I'm not convinced that is always necessary. Every situation is different. I just don't think that fast-draw like Clint Eastwood is realistic...

I'm sure not every situation would require a super fast draw. Situational awareness can help here. That said, it's not like it never happens so why in the world would you not train for it?

The way I'm reading these three posts above, there's two diverging paths that idea of "the draw" has taken on -

Initially, I believe what @KillerFord1977 wrote of is not necessarily related to either ease/speed-of-access or draw speed: rather, it is simply about the need to practice accessing and drawing the weapon - to bring what you are carrying with you, however you are carrying it, into the active fight.

He made no note of how fast he was able to get to the weapon - only that as he tried to access and bring the weapon into the fight, he encountered difficulties that he had not foreseen.

@Jfal 's reply takes in-fight access instead down another path: that of ease-of-accessibility and draw speed.

And while the last few posts after that, including my own reply, have focused on this portion of the question, I think that we should also take a step back for, as @Bassbob so wisely noted, not every lethal-force encounter is necessarily "won" by the "fast draw."

The Active Self Protection YouTube Channel hosted by John Correia is full of both instances where the fast-draw allowed the righteous defender to triumph as well as shows instances where such an attempt, made at the wrong time cost the defender dearly.

Indeed, the fast-draw is only one skill set, and arguably, one could make a very convincing case of it being perhaps the less important skill, versus the "softer" skill of being more situationally aware, so that either the gun does not have to come into play at all, or that it can be accessed earlier in the encounter.
 
^ Not trying to bait anything at all - I honestly just wanted a fuller picture of the metric that you were using. :) As I'm fond of reminding anyone who asks it of me, I do not believe that metrics are fulfilled unless we have full accounting of (1) time, (2) distance, and (3) target [size]. (y)

And on a personal note, thank you for contributing to my list of range-drills. :)

And in reading your reply, the highlighted part also has me re-reading this thread a bit.....

I'm going to backtrack a little, here, as by the way I'm reading the more recent posts in this thread, I think there's a bit of divergence going on:







The way I'm reading these three posts above, there's two diverging paths that idea of "the draw" has taken on -

Initially, I believe what @KillerFord1977 wrote of is not necessarily related to either ease/speed-of-access or draw speed: rather, it is simply about the need to practice accessing and drawing the weapon - to bring what you are carrying with you, however you are carrying it, into the active fight.

He made no note of how fast he was able to get to the weapon - only that as he tried to access and bring the weapon into the fight, he encountered difficulties that he had not foreseen.

@Jfal 's reply takes in-fight access instead down another path: that of ease-of-accessibility and draw speed.

And while the last few posts after that, including my own reply, have focused on this portion of the question, I think that we should also take a step back for, as @Bassbob so wisely noted, not every lethal-force encounter is necessarily "won" by the "fast draw."

The Active Self Protection YouTube Channel hosted by John Correia is full of both instances where the fast-draw allowed the righteous defender to triumph as well as shows instances where such an attempt, made at the wrong time cost the defender dearly.

Indeed, the fast-draw is only one skill set, and arguably, one could make a very convincing case of it being perhaps the less important skill, versus the "softer" skill of being more situationally aware, so that either the gun does not have to come into play at all, or that it can be accessed earlier in the encounter.
This assumes that somehow quickly bringing a gun to play has taken the place of situational awareness and the knowledge of when it is legal and necessary to do so in the first place. Those two things aren't and shouldn't be mutually exclusive. It really doesn't have anything to do with how quickly you draw, rather whether you draw at all. That is completely your responsibility to figure out.

I would argue that the circumstances that would facilitate a slow draw are very rare indeed. Perhaps you are behind cover and someone is stalking you. Or maybe you're in your back room and you just heard your front door shatter. The vast majority of situations on the street where you might want to actually draw your weapon, you are going to need to get it up and on target in a hurry.
 
This assumes that somehow quickly bringing a gun to play has taken the place of situational awareness and the knowledge of when it is legal and necessary to do so in the first place. Those two things aren't and shouldn't be mutually exclusive. It really doesn't have anything to do with how quickly you draw, rather whether you draw at all. That is completely your responsibility to figure out.

^ Absolutely agreed.

I would argue that the circumstances that would facilitate a slow draw are very rare indeed. Perhaps you are behind cover and someone is stalking you. Or maybe you're in your back room and you just heard your front door shatter. The vast majority of situations on the street where you might want to actually draw your weapon, you are going to need to get it up and on target in a hurry.

^ I honestly don't know. In a significant portion of the surveillance videos I've seen featured on sites such as that of ASP, the need for surreptitious weapons-access in-fight is clearly what allowed the defender to come out on-top.

ECQC expert Craig Douglas ("Southnarc") of ShivWorks was perhaps the first SME that made me aware of the problem of "timing" with regard to in-fight weapons access. While I've unfortunately not yet had a chance to attend his live training classes, I'd watched and listed to his stuff (both free and paid-only) for years, and yet it still took having the crap physically beat out of me in a few integrated combatives classes before I finally internalized those lessons that he'd presented.

To me, the idea of when the fight actually begins is a rather fascinating subject: is it that moment when we're already entangled (not necessarily physically - this could mean simply when weapons are presented by either party) with our opponent(s)? or does it happen even earlier? i.e. is the process of deselection -be it by avoidance/de-escalation- also a component, even though by-definition we've obviated the possibility of confrontation to begin with?
 
^ Absolutely agreed.



^ I honestly don't know. In a significant portion of the surveillance videos I've seen featured on sites such as that of ASP, the need for surreptitious weapons-access in-fight is clearly what allowed the defender to come out on-top.

ECQC expert Craig Douglas ("Southnarc") of ShivWorks was perhaps the first SME that made me aware of the problem of "timing" with regard to in-fight weapons access. While I've unfortunately not yet had a chance to attend his live training classes, I'd watched and listed to his stuff (both free and paid-only) for years, and yet it still took having the crap physically beat out of me in a few integrated combatives classes before I finally internalized those lessons that he'd presented.

To me, the idea of when the fight actually begins is a rather fascinating subject: is it that moment when we're already entangled (not necessarily physically - this could mean simply when weapons are presented by either party) with our opponent(s)? or does it happen even earlier? i.e. is the process of deselection -be it by avoidance/de-escalation- also a component, even though by-definition we've obviated the possibility of confrontation to begin with?
Hmm. This particular aspect of the conversation is begging for me to write about 7 paragraphs detailing my thought processes about a lot of stuff that has very little to do with the actual original topic, other than metaphysically. However, I am not that good/quick at writing/typing. Particularly on this platform. True enough I was an English major 35 years ago and used to pride myself on writing A papers in the car on the way to school, but that was a long time ago. These days I need time to outline and proofread if I am going to create a dissertation. I am barely holding on to basic grammar rules and sentence structure at this point. ;)

Let's just say that the way it has always been for me, including pedestrian high school fist fights, is that the fight begins the second I know there is going to be a fight. I have never been the guy that talks shite. As soon as someone says something or acts some way that leads me to believe they are considering starting a fight with me, I hit them hard and first. And the second I know I am going to hit someone I am already lining them up. This is something that I had to overcome ( to a degree) when considering arming myself for personal protection. Or at least change the parameters somewhat. You have to shift from the mindset of immediate and overwhelming action to intensely scrutinizing the situation and making yourself mentally on the edge without immediate physical reaction.

None of which really changes the fact that if I decide to introduce deadly force to a situation it's a safe bet it needs to be immediate, barring a handful of situations one could imagine where having a gun in your hand, at some ready position, would be necessary or prudent. Though I will admit that having worked on the streets of north St. Louis for nearly a decade there were many times where my hand was on my gun in my holster long before anything around me got close to me.
 
Hmm. This particular aspect of the conversation is begging for me to write about 7 paragraphs detailing my thought processes about a lot of stuff that has very little to do with the actual original topic, other than metaphysically. However, I am not that good/quick at writing/typing. Particularly on this platform. True enough I was an English major 35 years ago and used to pride myself on writing A papers in the car on the way to school, but that was a long time ago. These days I need time to outline and proofread if I am going to create a dissertation. I am barely holding on to basic grammar rules and sentence structure at this point. ;)

Let's just say that the way it has always been for me, including pedestrian high school fist fights, is that the fight begins the second I know there is going to be a fight. I have never been the guy that talks shite. As soon as someone says something or acts some way that leads me to believe they are considering starting a fight with me, I hit them hard and first. And the second I know I am going to hit someone I am already lining them up. This is something that I had to overcome ( to a degree) when considering arming myself for personal protection. Or at least change the parameters somewhat. You have to shift from the mindset of immediate and overwhelming action to intensely scrutinizing the situation and making yourself mentally on the edge without immediate physical reaction.

None of which really changes the fact that if I decide to introduce deadly force to a situation it's a safe bet it needs to be immediate, barring a handful of situations one could imagine where having a gun in your hand, at some ready position, would be necessary or prudent. Though I will admit that having worked on the streets of north St. Louis for nearly a decade there were many times where my hand was on my gun in my holster long before anything around me got close to me.
And that is situational awareness pure and simple.
 
I hear you guys and don't disagree...I do find myself carrying in a number of different pockets and positions based on clothing and printing. I am getting used to the IWB for longer periods of sitting (driving)...front pocket jeans carry, coat pocket chest, coat pocket interior, cargo pocket...I would rather be carrying with my firearm in an unpracticed position for draw, than not carrying at all...kinda sounds like an argument for a .380, doesn't it? Don't misinterpret that crack, I think a .380 can be plenty sufficient for most instances.

The thoughts about John Corella's channel things that occurred to me as well. He has LOTS of great videos of real self defense scenarios.
 
Last edited:
I hear you guys and don't disagree...I do find myself carrying in a number of different pockets and positions based on clothing and printing. I am getting used to the IWB for longer periods of sitting (driving)...front pocket jeans carry, coat pocket chest, coat pocket interior, cargo pocket...I would rather be carrying with my firearm in an unpracticed position for draw, than not carrying at all...kinda sounds like an argument for a .380, doesn't it? Don't misinterpret that crack, I think a .380 can be plenty sufficient for most instances.
I've been thinking a lot about appendix carry lately. I have resisted on the same ridiculous grounds ( You'll shoot your junk off) just on principle. It does seem like it would be faster though and I do possess unmovable trigger discipline. In any case if you shoot yourself drawing from 3:30 there's a fair chance you're bleeding out anyway.
 
My "Fat-Guy" holster from JX Tactical was designed for appendix, but that position only works for me standing. I drive a truck for 12 hours a day, and it's impossible to carry appendix while seated in a vehicle (or at least draw while seated). Been working on 4o'clock...maybe 3:30 o'clock.

If you have good trigger discipline, appendix carry should be a legitimate option for you.
 
I've been thinking a lot about appendix carry lately. I have resisted on the same ridiculous grounds ( You'll shoot your junk off) just on principle. It does seem like it would be faster though and I do possess unmovable trigger discipline. In any case if you shoot yourself drawing from 3:30 there's a fair chance you're bleeding out anyway.
I carry currently at 3:30 OWB however with my new revolver I’m thinking about IWB just left of my belt buckle for a cross draw, I’m right handed, that being said a lot of my training is trigger discipline and every time I draw my trigger finger is extended outside the T.G. So I don’t fear shooting myself.
With the amount of car jacking’s on the rise my gun is either on the seat next to me or in the holster but what I’m wearing is pulled up and tucked behind the gun for easy access.
 
My "Fat-Guy" holster from JX Tactical was designed for appendix, but that position only works for me standing. I drive a truck for 12 hours a day, and it's impossible to carry appendix while seated in a vehicle (or at least draw while seated). Been working on 4o'clock...maybe 3:30 o'clock.

If you have good trigger discipline, appendix carry should be a legitimate option for you.
Just an observation, as long as your elbow is good, 4:30-5:00 is supremely comfortable for sitting in a truck for long periods of time.
 
Back
Top