This was debated during the Kyle Rittenhouse incident, all the internet lawyers saying Kyle Rittenhouse couldn't claim self-defense in court because he committed a felony carrying the AR-15....
The common sense people, with actual experience with Gun and Self-Defense Law, stating Self-Defense is Self-Defense, doesn't matter if there is another crime, he will be prosecuted on the other crimes it does not negate Self-Defense...
My understanding of the Stand Your Ground laws is just to negate the leftist morons going after just people when they defend themselves, abusing the "Duty to Flee" concept used in the law...
Cause you know, a Prosecutor wouldn't try to prosecute some kid running away from his attackers and a mob screaming "get him" and only firing when he had no other choice, as being the attacker in the situation.... ...naw, will never happen...
What do you think a prosecutor would do to a guy that righteously defended himself, was not the aggressor, but didn't turn around and run away before defending himself?