DOJ: Fishers, Indiana brothers sentenced after building, selling machine guns intended for ‘ISIS’ terrorist group

[shanneba]

FISHERS, Ind. — Two Fishers brothers were sentenced to over 35 years combined after manufacturing and distributing machine guns for ISIS.

Moyad Dannon, 25, was sentenced to 200 months, equivalent to 16 years and eight months in federal prison followed by a lifetime of supervised release. He pleaded guilty to attempting to provide material support for resources, namely, firearms to a designated foreign terrorist organization.
His brother, Mahde Dannon was sentenced to 20 years in prison in October 2021 after pleading guilty to the same charges.
...
According to court documents, in June 2018, the Dannon brothers devised a scheme to deliver stolen firearms to a convicted felon who was cooperating with the FBI.
...
Between July and December 2018, the Dannon brothers sold several illegally obtained firearms to the cooperating individual.
the Dannon brothers agreed to manufacture and sell at least 55 additional fully automatic “ghost guns” to the buyer from the American southwest border

DOJ: Fishers brothers sentenced after building, selling machine guns intended for ‘ISIS’ terrorist group

FISHERS, Ind. — Two Fishers brothers were sentenced to over 35 years combined after manufacturing and distributing machine guns for ISIS. Moyad Dannon, 25, was sentenced to 200 months, equiva…

fox59.com

 

[Lock n' Load]

Far too light a sentence! Should be life, in Gitmo, for terrorists!

 

[ex13F]

Far too light a sentence! Should be life, in Gitmo, for terrorists!

Wouldn't surprise me if they received a pardon and got jobs at an Ivy League school.

 

[Old_Me]

Far too light a sentence! Should be life, in Gitmo, for terrorists!

i concur....Gitmo

 

[Mr.W.]

Right. Neither should witness another sunrise while free men.

 

[HansGruber]

Far too light a sentence! Should be life, in Gitmo, for terrorists!

Except, of course, that’d be unconstitutional, since they are citizens.

But I bet that wouldn’t bother you.

 

[Bassbob]

Except, of course, that’d be unconstitutional, since they are citizens.

But I bet that wouldn’t bother you.

It wouldn't be unconstitutional if they are given due process and convicted and sentenced in a court of law.

 

[HansGruber]

It wouldn't be unconstitutional if they are given due process and convicted and sentenced in a court of law.

Nope.

Even if sentenced, they still have rights.

Gitmo’s extraterritorial status means all prisoners are non citizens and do not have constitutional rights. That’s why it’s there, and not in the US proper.

 

[Bassbob]

Nope.

Even if sentenced, they still have rights.

Gitmo’s extraterritorial status means all prisoners are non citizens and do not have constitutional rights. That’s why it’s there, and not in the US proper.

True enough. Wasn't considering the Gitmo thing.

 

[Lock n' Load]

Except, of course, that’d be unconstitutional, since they are citizens.

But I bet that wouldn’t bother you.

Actually misread the post, thinking foreign terrorists when they are domestic terrorists Being citizens, yes, it would bother me to ignore the Constitution as that is the governing precedent in this case. Wish that more government agencies would follow it as closely as you do Hans! Sorry for my mistake.