testtest

Federal Suppressor Ban Introduced

The sponsors of this bill are probably watching too much TV, movies, etc. and think a suppressor completely silences the report of a firearm which we all know is not the case. Do they want us to go deaf? The only upside to that is that we wouldn't have to listen to their incessant BS ravings anymore. If they would turn their attention to crime and illegal firearm acquisition, the problem would no longer exist.
 
The sponsors of this bill are probably watching too much TV, movies, etc. and think a suppressor completely silences the report of a firearm which we all know is not the case. Do they want us to go deaf? The only upside to that is that we wouldn't have to listen to their incessant BS ravings anymore. If they would turn their attention to crime and illegal firearm acquisition, the problem would no longer exist.
I remember a Gunsmoke episode years ago where a guy came back to kill all the people who sat on a jury and convicted him. He was using a Winchester '94 30-30 with a " silencer" . No one could hear him fire it even 20 feet away. :rolleyes:
 
Meanwhile, in many parts of Europe, using a suppressor is considered what "responsible" gun owners do at the range and while hunting.
And in Europe natural gas is considered a "green" fossil fuel.

That being said the increased use of natural gas over the past few years has allowed the USA to have the greatest decrease in carbon emissions than any other country. But that also doesn't fit the agenda.
 
Last edited:
And in Europe natural gas is considered a "green" fossil fuel.
There's no shortage of shell games that go on with European energy sources, and how they are characterized, for sure (a whole rich topic on it's own....)

But when it comes to suppressors, they are generally considered to be the 'considerate' thing to use in regards to your fellow shooters on the range or in the field. It's just interesting to note how different the perception of suppressors is in Europe vs. the U.S.

That being said the increased use of natural gas over the past few years has allowed the USA to have the greatest decrease in carbon emissions than any other country. But that also doesn't fit the agenda.
Along with the economic and geopolitical advantages it has given us as well. I think we pay a lot of lip service to renewables in the U.S. (and no doubt, we are also making big investments in it as well) but I don't think there is much illusion amongst those 'in-the-know' about how our bread is really buttered, and will continue to be for a long time.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top