testtest

Floridians Response to Russian Submarine off Coast

The Gunshine State
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1718459211253.jpg
    FB_IMG_1718459211253.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 171
Russian subs are always off the cost of Alaska and the coast of Uk. You’ve got a better chance of seeing a Russian sun off of Scotland than a British one. And Russian subs routinely patrol off of the east coast.

I bet @Talyn could fill you in on all of that in detail.
Question: did they run on the surface as they are doing now in Florida. Alaska, UK all at the same time ❓
 
SimonRL is correct.

Running on the surface is a show-of-force to send a message.

Aside from the sub going to Cuba, there are other Russian subs in the Atlantic & Pacific all the time.

And the so-called NATO fleet off St. Petersburg is the annual BALTOPS exercise in international (outside the 12-mile limit) and NATO member waters (within the 12-mile limit), throughout the entire Baltic Sea vs. hanging loose off St. Petersburg.



BTW - A Russian Su-24 violated Swedish airspace over Gotland that was conducting reconn on the BALTOPS exercise.

https://theaviationist.com/2024/06/15/russian-su-24-violates-swedish-airspace/
 
Last edited:
In my experience, and admittedly I've been out of the loop for a while, having numbers of certain ships is one thing; having a certain percentage of those ships operational is quite another. This was especially the case for Russia.
Correct.

Typically the "Rule of Threes" apply.

1/3 of ships are on active deployment, 1/3 are either coming-down or working-up from/for a deployment (Note: these can be surged back to/or forward in case of a critical need), and 1/3 are in various categories of maintenance and are un-deployable.

For those countries with poor fleet condition these ratios are different.

Even the US has "issues" regarding availability deployable units due to the degradation of the industrial base due to various factors, and the limited number of shipyards that build/maintain various types.
 
Correct.

Typically the "Rule of Threes" apply.

1/3 of ships are on active deployment, 1/3 are either coming-down or working-up from/for a deployment (Note: these can be surged back to/or forward in case of a critical need), and 1/3 are in various categories of maintenance and are un-deployable.

For those countries with poor fleet condition these ratios are different.

Even the US has "issues" regarding availability deployable units due to the degradation of the industrial base due to various factors, and the limited number of shipyards that build/maintain various types.
And while I had access, Russia definitely leaned towards undeployable - bigly.
 
Back
Top