dadoser
Master Class
This seems to be one of the most authentic and objective gun forums I frequent - so here goes -
Interested in your thoughts on the points in the video as well as the whole "Glock Culture" thing.
I posted the video below to a private facebook gun group I'm in.
I think the dude makes some great points of Glock criticism that should be able to be discussed objectively.
I got accused of "bashing" Glock.
Was told - Why do you need to bash Glock in order to feel better about owning Sigs? (I own a glock 19, 1 P320, Sig P226/9s, 2 PDPs. 2 FNs, 1 Staccato P, 2 P365XLs - clearly not a Team sig guy here)
The replies and sh*t I received was exactly the point 3 made by the guy in the video.
Also I think he's dead on with point 6. I don't think the 43X is a micro compact. While "micro" is a marketing term with little defined dimensions/characteristics - I think a true micro has all the following - grip in which most adults cannot get their pinky on; mag capacity in that grip of 10-13; and approx 1" narrow. The 43X meets one of those. I think the 43X and 48 are single stack compacts really. (NOT even saying the 43X is a bad choice or firearm.) .......and just to continue my rant further - I think the glock bias in the 2A community - because it has to have some glock on the list of "Best micro" - the 43X is called a "micro" when it really is not.
P365, Hellcat, FN 503, S&W CSX, Taurus G4X, etc, .....maybe the Glock 43 - but not the 43X IMO - too tall.
I got sh*t for that in the discussion.
Overwhelmingly the replies were proving exactly point 3 in the video.
Is Glock the only firearm, that when criticized gets this kind of reaction? (again point 3 made in the video)
My post -
"Top 6 reasons why people are getting rid of Glocks -
Interesting points - watch video for more elaboration.
1. No Innovation.
2.. Ugly
3. The Glock culture
4. Plastic
5. No thumb safety
6. They don't make a micro compact.
Not sure of the "getting rid of" part - but maybe these are reasons folks go with non-Glock options.
Does he have a point on each of these 6?"
Interested in your thoughts on the points in the video as well as the whole "Glock Culture" thing.
I posted the video below to a private facebook gun group I'm in.
I think the dude makes some great points of Glock criticism that should be able to be discussed objectively.
I got accused of "bashing" Glock.
Was told - Why do you need to bash Glock in order to feel better about owning Sigs? (I own a glock 19, 1 P320, Sig P226/9s, 2 PDPs. 2 FNs, 1 Staccato P, 2 P365XLs - clearly not a Team sig guy here)
The replies and sh*t I received was exactly the point 3 made by the guy in the video.
Also I think he's dead on with point 6. I don't think the 43X is a micro compact. While "micro" is a marketing term with little defined dimensions/characteristics - I think a true micro has all the following - grip in which most adults cannot get their pinky on; mag capacity in that grip of 10-13; and approx 1" narrow. The 43X meets one of those. I think the 43X and 48 are single stack compacts really. (NOT even saying the 43X is a bad choice or firearm.) .......and just to continue my rant further - I think the glock bias in the 2A community - because it has to have some glock on the list of "Best micro" - the 43X is called a "micro" when it really is not.
P365, Hellcat, FN 503, S&W CSX, Taurus G4X, etc, .....maybe the Glock 43 - but not the 43X IMO - too tall.
I got sh*t for that in the discussion.
Overwhelmingly the replies were proving exactly point 3 in the video.
Is Glock the only firearm, that when criticized gets this kind of reaction? (again point 3 made in the video)
My post -
"Top 6 reasons why people are getting rid of Glocks -
Interesting points - watch video for more elaboration.
1. No Innovation.
2.. Ugly
3. The Glock culture
4. Plastic
5. No thumb safety
6. They don't make a micro compact.
Not sure of the "getting rid of" part - but maybe these are reasons folks go with non-Glock options.
Does he have a point on each of these 6?"