testtest

Guns and Musicians...

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20231022_200547_Google.jpg
    Screenshot_20231022_200547_Google.jpg
    350.1 KB · Views: 70
Hi,

This five year old article may give noobys something to think about but it asks no new questions and has no answers. I agree that training is essential but when does a training requirement turn into infringement? How to encourage new gun owners to train without being restrictive?

Do you really think that was an actual conversation the author had with a coworker?


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
Hi,

This five year old article may give noobys something to think about but it asks no new questions and has no answers. I agree that training is essential but when does a training requirement turn into infringement? How to encourage new gun owners to train without being restrictive?

Do you really think that was an actual conversation the author had with a coworker?


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
The original date of the article is irrelevant.
 
With rights come responsibilities.
In this country you have a right to own a firearm.
But then you have a responsibility to learn how to use it properly.
And if you fail to use it properly ( as in legally) then you will and should be charged with a crime. Until then the onus is NOT on the citizen to demonstrate to the GOVERNMENT that they are responsible enough to exercise their rights.
 
Hi,

The original date of the article is irrelevant.

Of course, you are correct. Please pardon my flippance. I suppose the 2A rights/responsibility issue has been pondered and argued about since the Bill of Rights was signed.


And if you fail to use it properly ( as in legally) then you will and should be charged with a crime. Until then the onus is NOT on the citizen to demonstrate to the GOVERNMENT that they are responsible enough to exercise their rights.

Agreed. In this instance our responsibility is to our civil society, not the government.


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
Back
Top