testtest

Is 5.7x28mm Just Overpriced .22 Magnum?

I am unfazed by these new calibers that get released as a way to get people to spend more money on a new gun. They are solutions to problems no one knew they had prior to their introduction. 380acp, 9mm, 40s&w, 45acp, 10mm, 38 special, 357mag, and the like has been doing everything all these newer latest and greatest claim to do, and they've been doing it for 10x longer.
So are you saying: you shoot black powder firearms ❓
 
So are you saying: you shoot black powder firearms ❓
I'm saying these new latest and greatest calibers (fads) are mostly gimmicks to sell more guns and to solve problems that don't really exist. They aren't going to stand the test of time just like many of the old flavors of the month before them IMHO.
 
I am unfazed by these new calibers that get released as a way to get people to spend more money on a new gun. They are solutions to problems no one knew they had prior to their introduction. Everyone would have lived and gotten by just fine if some of these calibers never existed (30 Super Carry included). 380acp, 9mm, 40s&w, 45acp, 10mm, 38 special, 357mag, and the like has been doing everything all these newer latest and greatest claim to do, and they've been doing it for 10x longer.
AND don't forget the creed-no- more lovers :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: . BTW, I own several and wish I didn't waste money on them. Never mind, my kids will probably like them!
 
I am unfazed by these new calibers that get released as a way to get people to spend more money on a new gun. They are solutions to problems no one knew they had prior to their introduction. Everyone would have lived and gotten by just fine if some of these calibers never existed (30 Super Carry included). 380acp, 9mm, 40s&w, 45acp, 10mm, 38 special, 357mag, and the like has been doing everything all these newer latest and greatest claim to do, and they've been doing it for 10x longer.
Don't forget the prc line!
 
I'm saying these new latest and greatest calibers (fads) are mostly gimmicks to sell more guns and to solve problems that don't really exist. They aren't going to stand the test of time just like many of the old flavors of the month before them IMHO.

I get your point, but I'm not sure what caliber you're referring to? 5.7x28? If so, it's over 30 years old - not exactly 'new.'

The P90 is currently in service with military and police forces in over 40 countries. In the United States the P90 is in use with over 200 law enforcement agencies, including the U.S. Secret Service.

If I had to guess, those might be 2004 numbers, but I'd have a hard time believe they are 2024 numbers. "In service" and actually in use aren't necessarily the same thing. I bet there are a lot of P90s gathering dust these days. Secret Service and a few other agencies/units might employ them for special use cases, but beyond that, I'm not sure what the compelling reason would be, over other available options that are ballistically superior.
 
Btw, this article is a good read, with references and linked sources, including Fackler's testing and conclusions on 5.7x28:


The Paul Harrell vid linked in the article is worth a watch as well.

One thing that stood out to me was that the article cites that Fackler found that out of the P90 (10.4" barrel), 5.7x28 rounds travelled at an avg. velocity of 2,239 fps with a 31gr load.

BBTI lists multiple 30gr. .22 WMR loads capable of reaching 2,100 fps out of a 10" barrel.
 
Last edited:
On the pistol side of things, let's look at the ballistics using the Ruger 57 from this article:

Out of the 5" barrel of the 57, velocities of 1,663-1,790 were achieved with several different ammo options. Those velocities are also consistent with what Harrell chrono'd.

If we refer back to the BBTI chart for .22 WMR, we see multiple ammo options achieving 1,650 - 1,723 fps out of a 5" barrel.

So yeah, I remain unconvinced that "there is no realistic comparison" to be made here. It might just be a comparison that 5.7 fanboys don't want to admit. ;)
 
On the pistol side of things, let's look at the ballistics using the Ruger 57 from this article:

Out of the 5" barrel of the 57, velocities of 1,663-1,790 were achieved with several different ammo options. Those velocities are also consistent with what Harrell chrono'd.

If we refer back to the BBTI chart for .22 WMR, we see multiple ammo options achieving 1,650 - 1,723 fps out of a 5" barrel.

So yeah, I remain unconvinced that "there is no realistic comparison" to be made here. It might just be a comparison that 5.7 fanboys don't want to admit. ;)
I can't say I'm a fanboy, but I wouldn't mind having a s&w 22mag like the 5.7. They did release it.
 
Seems like every
I get your point, but I'm not sure what caliber you're referring to? 5.7x28? If so, it's over 30 years old - not exactly 'new.'
Well I stand corrected. I've never heard of it and I'll guarantee you that most others never heard of the round until FN introduced their (expensive) offering a few years back. At that point, many started jumping on the bandwagon.
 
You want a bottlenecked .22 that fits in a handgun?

Get a .22TCM. 40gr bullet @ 2100+ fps out of a 5” barrel.

Better platform (1911) to boot.
What's the purpose though. I'm trying to understand. What is a .22TCM, 5.7X28mm, etc going to kill that a regular 9mm or the like can't equally stop and/or kill for less?

Plus, the only time ot makes since to use a 5" or longer firearm is for home defense, hunting, or defense against 4 legged predators. Why would anyone choose a .22TCM, 5.7X28mm, etc for those task?

(Not loaded questions. I really want to know.)
 
Recoil; it doesn’t really have any out of my widebody 1911.

Additionally, the 9# recoil spring makes operating the slide easy for pretty much anyone.
I wasn't aware that recoil was an issue especially with 9mm out of a full size 9mm or 45acp handgun. It doesn't seem like the primary buyers of these calibers are recoil sensitive either. Most of the people who I see talking about these calibers own dozens of 9mm's, 45acp's, ARs, shotguns, 38/357 revolvers, etc....
 
Back
Top