Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “Ma Deuce — The M2 .50-Caliber Machine Gun” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/m2-browning-50-caliber-machine-gun/.
I think our M-60's had M-2's and the A1's had the M-85, not sure though. I do remember ammo in 50 round boxes for loading/reloading the 85 that were a pain in a**. This was when I was in 1/68 Armor 8th Inf div Germany 1965. The 85 was dual rate of fire 850/900 rpm on high and around 450/500 rpm on low. Correct me if I'm wrong. Was in M-48A3's in Vietnam bet the A5's had some serious upgrades.I used them in M113's and M48A5's in Korea. I used the M85 on the M60 series tank which had fixed HS&T. Never had a M2 quit except when it ran out of BB's. The M85 was always getting jamed up and a pain to load/reload. I wish they could have mounted the M2 on the M60s.
The A5's were great. The low-profile cupola was a game changer. Originally the A5's with the low profile were supposed to have M60D's but they changed that and attached a M2 mount for us like the one on the M113’s. The loader had the M60D though. The M68 105mm was the same gun as the M60s. When I went back to Korea, they had reequipped the Armor Units with M60A3TTS tanks. With the Laser Ranger Finders, Tank Thermal Sights and no search Light. The M60A3TTS was a major change to our advantage.I think our M-60's had M-2's and the A1's had the M-85, not sure though. I do remember ammo in 50 round boxes for loading/reloading the 85 that were a pain in a**. This was when I was in 1/68 Armor 8th Inf div Germany 1965. The 85 was dual rate of fire 850/900 rpm on high and around 450/500 rpm on low. Correct me if I'm wrong. Was in M-48A3's in Vietnam bet the A5's had some serious upgrades.
Can only imagine using a laser range finder and the thermal sight. All we had was a crappy IR sight. Thanks for the info.The A5's were great. The low-profile cupola was a game changer. Originally the A5's with the low profile were supposed to have M60D's but they changed that and attached a M2 mount for us like the one on the M113’s. The loader had the M60D though. The M68 105mm was the same gun as the M60s. When I went back to Korea, they had reequipped the Armor Units with M60A3TTS tanks. With the Laser Ranger Finders, Tank Thermal Sights and no search Light. The M60A3TTS was a major change to our advantage.
Can only imagine using a laser range finder and the thermal sight. All we had was a crappy IR sight. Thanks for the infoWe were
Yeah, bet that was a game changer for the Inf unit.We were training with the infantry one night. We had them hide in the tree line. Then we invited the leaders over to our tanks and showed them our sights. Their faces went blank when we were able to show all of the troops in the tree line with no moon light.
We did not have the TTS, but I was on the Hughes LASER Rangefinder Test Project at the Armor Board. My first test there after Vietnam, 1972. Test on the M551 and also used on the M60A2 (which I also tested).Can only imagine using a laser range finder and the thermal sight. All we had was a crappy IR sight. Thanks for the info.
I had a neighbor who was a gunner on a Huey in Viet-NamHollywood of course, but .50s on jeeps.
Yeah, very fast softballs. In better resolution (which I've limited here), you can easily make out the "wobbling spiral" of the bullet after it struck the ground. G/2/11th ACR. My photo.I had the rare opportunity to live fire Ma from a tank one time, at night. That was freaking awesome. The tracer rounds look like softballs going downrange.