I’ll give it a half
I see Turkey
Seriously though… thats bad to the bone right there. Very nice !!!!
I’ll give it a half
I see Turkey
Seriously though… thats bad to the bone right there. Very nice !!!!
UZi's are OK.Who thinks HansGruber's Israeli surplus FN Herstal Mk3 would look better with my UZI?
View attachment 26917
Who thinks HansGruber's Israeli surplus FN Herstal Mk3 would look better with my UZI?
View attachment 26917
I think your Uzi would look better without the wood.Who thinks HansGruber's Israeli surplus FN Herstal Mk3 would look better with my UZI?
View attachment 26917
I don’t think I’d trade my Israeli surplus FN Herstal Mk3 with C&S upgrades for a HP35…I’ve got lots of MecGar 15rd mags for it, it shoots incredibly well, and it’s 100% reliable.
And considering I traded a Glock 19 for it…View attachment 26908
(I call this my “Classic SAS” combo…)
I don't know who wrote that article, but they don't know much about BHPs.I got my new Gun Tests magazine earlier this week and they had an article that compared the SA-35 to an original Browning Hi-Power. Bottom line, they gave the Springfield a grade of A and the Browning a B. It was their opinion that the SA-35 was less expensive, had a better trigger, better sights and is completely modern. In closing they wrote that they would choose the SA-35 over buying a Browning Hi-Power because the SA-35 is better in every area that should matter to the modern self-dense shooter. I'm sure satisfied new owners would agree.
When I got this gun back in the mid 80s the wooden stock was a rarity and cost much more than they do today. For a long time, many that were sold didn't come with the attaching piece. I've still got the collapsible stock, but I prefer shooting it with the wooden stock attached. There are lots of pictures from that time period of Israeli soldiers carrying Uzi's with wooden stocks and with suppressors as well.I think your Uzi would look better without the wood.