testtest

People losing jobs over Trump remarks.

Just curious, how do y'all feel about this? Is it right for a person to get fired for their opinions and social media posts?
No, BUT, good. No great! People have been losing their jobs, being disciplined, reprimanded, for saying things, or using the newest unacceptable word, for years. I.E. in the Maine Dept. of Corrections, it is no longer acceptable to use the word, Inmate. The new acceptable terms are "resident or client". Failure to follow these "guidelines" will result in disciplinary action up to and including unpaid suspension/termination. Now the control freaks and loony left have their B.S. turned on them. Marvelous! I for one am sick and tired of "we don't want to sink to their level". Just stand there in your self-righteousness and get continually kicked between the pockets. FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE! The @$$hats made this bed now let them sleep in it.
 
Just because you CAN doesn't mean you SHOULD! And if you do, expect the consequences.

If your words bring harm to the company you work for, don't act surprised and offended when fired. Accept the consequences for your actions (and maybe learn something from them), PERIOD!
 
I found this article with their take of things:
*******************************
1721421964932.png
 
Here is Marjorie Taylor Greene take on Trump shooting:
**********************************************************

 
This whole thing feeds right into the pervasive addiction to outrage that this country has. Most people are not happy unless they’re prattling on about some offense dealt to them. Did anyone really think these comments wouldn’t be made or is anyone surprised that they were? Bad form, bad taste? Sure. Some people are getting their comeuppance because of the forum they’ve responded in, but there’s just as many people making these comments in polite company, all to knowing nods. And honestly, it’s resulting in more likes and clicks in Trump’s favor - who, by the way, is without equal when it comes to weaponizing social media.
 
I read an article this morning that said a number of people have lost their jobs over social media posts saying they wished the shooter hadn't missed Trump.
Now I do enjoy seeing an A-hole get their due, but I also believe in the Constitution and the 1st Amendment. I may not agree with what you say. I may even hate you for what you say. But I do support your right to say it.
Just curious, how do y'all feel about this? Is it right for a person to get fired for their opinions and social media posts?
hey, i got one for you, i got this on my facebook page.....

some moron at a Harley-Davidson dealership got canned, for his remarks, regarding the assassination attempt on Mr. Trump.


Youngstown Harley-Davidson ·​

Follow​

·


🛑
Important Statement from Youngstown Harley-Davidson
🛑

We want to address the recent controversial post made by a former employee. As of Monday morning, that individual is no longer with our organization. We want to state that the employee's views were not in alignment with the dealership and that we do not agree with their statement nor do we stand for this type of hateful rhetoric.
We are dedicated to our community and committed to making every customer feel valued and heard.
#HarleyDavidson #YoungstownHarleyDavidson #YHD330


1721486866427.png



so you see, actions have consequences.....and the dealership has gotten a LOT of positive feedback for firing that moron...

1721487511193.png
 
Last edited:
I found this article and their take:
***************************************************



🚨 The NYT Reporter who Captured the Bullet Flying Past Trumps Head, was using the Kind of Camera & Settings you’d Use to Capture Live-Fire Action, Such as a Head Exploding!

Michael Yon, one of the most experienced combat war correspondents living today, made a Compelling assessment.

I put together his assessment in a more understandable breakdown, provided additional details, and my analysis.

🔴 All Quoted (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/photo-path-trump-assassination.html) from the NYT

• Who was the Photographer?
—— A famous veteran NYT photographer named Doug Mills.

• What Kind of Equipment & Settings were used?
—— Mr. Mills was using a Sony A1 and 24mm f/1.4 GM, capable of capturing images at up to 30 frames per second. Priced at $6,499.
—— He took these photos with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second. Extremely Fast by industry standards.

The above is quoted from NYT themselves.

🔴 The Perfect “Shot”

• If the gunman was firing an AR-15-style rifle, the .223-caliber or 5.56-millimeter bullets they use travel at roughly 3,200 feet per second when they leave the weapon’s muzzle.
—— “And with a 1/8,000th of a second shutter speed, this would allow the bullet to travel approximately four-tenths of a foot while the shutter is open.”

• Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bullet on a side trajectory as seen in that photo would be a one in a million shot and nearly impossible to catch even if one knew the bullet was coming.

At that distance and trajectory, had any bullet hit Trump, that type of camera and settings would have easily captured his head frankly exploding.

Were they there for the “Perfect Pulitzer Prize Head Shot”…?

🔴 COUNTER ARGUMENTS

• “Some journalists argue Its usage by the NYT photographers is not unusual.”
—— Only professional photographers can answer this question.

• “Shooting at 1/8000 at f1.6 in daylight is also not unusual, but necessary for proper exposure.”
—— again, only Professional and unbiased photographers can answer that question.

🔴 CRITICAL QUESTIONS THAT WILL EITHER PROVE OR DEBUNK THIS

• Examine any and all Video footage of the Photographer, Doug Mills, at least 1-2 minutes before the shot.
—— check body language.
—— how many images did he capture leading up to THAT moment?
—— was he ultra focused in the moments leading up to the shots?

• How many times has Doug Mills photographed at a Trump rally?
—— apply that same question to other cameramen & photographers.

• Who made the decision to send Doug Mills there?
—— climb the ladder.

• How common is it for these kinds of cameras and these settings used to capture rally speeches, where the “object” being photographed is standing still?
—— Trump campaign photographers can weigh in easily on this, or maybe even Gene Ho.

• Why were all legacy media outlets showing THIS rally Live?
—— they rarely do that…
—— CNN, MSNBC, FOX, and others decided to show THIS rally?
—— Find out who gave those outlets the green light to show this rally live. Climb the ladder.

These questions can lead the Trump campaign to answers.

ReTWEET ( )
 
Here is InfoWars take on Trumps shooting:
************************************************
 
Back
Top