Pepper Spray vs Bear Spray Against Dogs
- Thread starter OldGrunt
- Start date
Marek71
Master Class
That's awesome keep talking to it like it fully understands what you're saying you know this lady's voting for a Kamala.
last2brake
Elite
Talyn
SAINT
I seriously doubt any LEO in my state would arrest anyone for using bear spray to protect yourself from 2 or 4-legged attackers.
Over-kill is not a factor against a large aggressive dog determined to tear you up, nor a MS-13 (etc. other drug gangs) gang member determined to carve you up for kicks.
My .02
Over-kill is not a factor against a large aggressive dog determined to tear you up, nor a MS-13 (etc. other drug gangs) gang member determined to carve you up for kicks.
My .02
Bad Bear!
The Night Rider
Professional
I know this is an older thread but I found the law.
(G) to use any registered pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling;
The term “to use any registered pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling” means to use any registered pesticide in a manner not permitted by the labeling, except that the term shall not include (1) applying a pesticide at any dosage, concentration, or frequency less than that specified on the labeling unless the labeling specifically prohibits deviation from the specified dosage, concentration, or frequency, (2) applying a pesticide against any target pest not specified on the labeling if the application is to the crop, animal, or site specified on the labeling, unless the Administrator has required that the labeling specifically state that the pesticide may be used only for the pests specified on the labeling after the Administrator has determined that the use of the pesticide against other pests would cause an unreasonable adverse effect on the environment, (3) employing any method of application not prohibited by the labeling unless the labeling specifically states that the product may be applied only by the methods specified on the labeling, (4) mixing a pesticide or pesticides with a fertilizer when such mixture is not prohibited by the labeling, (5) any use of a pesticide in conformance with section 136c, 136p, or 136v of this title, or (6) any use of a pesticide in a manner that the Administrator determines to be consistent with the purposes of this subchapter. After March 31, 1979, the term shall not include the use of a pesticide for agricultural or forestry purposes at a dilution less than label dosage unless before or after that date the Administrator issues a regulation or advisory opinion consistent with the study provided for in section 27(b) of the Federal Pesticide Act of 1978, which regulation or advisory opinion specifically requires the use of definite amounts of dilution.
U.S. Code § 136j - Unlawful acts
(2)It shall be unlawful for any person—(G) to use any registered pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling;
7 U.S. Code § 136 - Definitions
(ee)To use any registered pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labelingThe term “to use any registered pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling” means to use any registered pesticide in a manner not permitted by the labeling, except that the term shall not include (1) applying a pesticide at any dosage, concentration, or frequency less than that specified on the labeling unless the labeling specifically prohibits deviation from the specified dosage, concentration, or frequency, (2) applying a pesticide against any target pest not specified on the labeling if the application is to the crop, animal, or site specified on the labeling, unless the Administrator has required that the labeling specifically state that the pesticide may be used only for the pests specified on the labeling after the Administrator has determined that the use of the pesticide against other pests would cause an unreasonable adverse effect on the environment, (3) employing any method of application not prohibited by the labeling unless the labeling specifically states that the product may be applied only by the methods specified on the labeling, (4) mixing a pesticide or pesticides with a fertilizer when such mixture is not prohibited by the labeling, (5) any use of a pesticide in conformance with section 136c, 136p, or 136v of this title, or (6) any use of a pesticide in a manner that the Administrator determines to be consistent with the purposes of this subchapter. After March 31, 1979, the term shall not include the use of a pesticide for agricultural or forestry purposes at a dilution less than label dosage unless before or after that date the Administrator issues a regulation or advisory opinion consistent with the study provided for in section 27(b) of the Federal Pesticide Act of 1978, which regulation or advisory opinion specifically requires the use of definite amounts of dilution.
KillerFord1977
SAINT
I think at this point, I’m fully rooting for the bear.
That lady is AAF !!
OK I’m contesting..next time a video is posted that you need ear plugs because of an annoying lady…..PLEASE let us know we need ear plugs for an annoying lady!!!!
Talk about nails ina. Chalk board!!!