Rep. Carolyn Maloney Drops the Mother of All Gun Control Bills

[BobM]

Rep. Carolyn Maloney Drops the Mother of All Gun Control Bills

Can you feel it? It’s coming. Now that the Democrats have control of the Presidency, as well as both houses of Congress, we’re about to see the mother of all gun control initiatives. Recently, we

armupsystem.com

 

[Bassbob]

I believe this is the same woman who at one point got an A rating from the NRA. Then when she moved to New York, overnight she became a gun control proponent.

 

[TidalWave]

Pardon my ignorance but did she “drop the bill” as in withdraw support? Or drop as in move forward for action?
I gather from scanning the article it’s the latter. Just wanted to clarify.

 

[Recusant]

It seems that the Dems are in a competition to see who can most damage our Constitutional rights.

 

[Peglegjoe]

Hopefully SCOTUS grows a pair when needed, and shuts down the madness before it's too late...

 

[BobM]

Hopefully SCOTUS grows a pair when needed, and shuts down the madness before it's too late...

Wishful thinking, but not seeing it by his and others actions in their witch hunt.
Am thinking they may have comprehension issues when comes to reading or may not read at all?
Sad when representatives go against the very foundations of what and who they're supposed to be representing.
What's that called again? Am tongue tied.

 

[ScottJ]

Wishful thinking, but not seeing it by his and others actions in their witch hunt.
Am thinking they may have comprehension issues when comes to reading or may not read at all?
Sad when representatives go against the very foundations of what and who they're supposed to be representing.
What's that called again? Am tongue tied.

"
Sad when representatives go against the very foundations of what and who they're supposed to be representing.
What's that called again?"

The word "turncoat" comes to mind.

 

[Keystone19250]

Except for a couple of those bills she is just stacking laws on top of laws that are already on the books. I’m worried about the “pork” that is always buried deep in these bills that turn out to be a major change that no on expects.

 

[jumpinjoe]

Every single word she has uttered here is an infringement on our 2nd amendment rights and/or a challenge to our constitution in general. As the writer says, she may very well be an honorable woman, but the real qualifier of her mindset is in this sentence..... "I believe that she is sincere in her motivations and doing what she feels is right." And therein lies the real problem. As is the case with most liberals/progressive, and even the liberal/progressive ideology is that they tend to 'feel' rather than to 'think'.

Feelings are based on emotion rather than logic and it's obvious from her offerings she is basing her entire list of proposed laws on emotions.

 

[wmg1299]

Did Maloney at least have the decency to tell Sheila Jackson Lee to, "Hold my beer", before she wrote these bills?

 

[wmg1299]

Except for a couple of those bills she is just stacking laws on top of laws that are already on the books.

I've always been puzzled by this logic. Unless I missed that day of law school, I don't recall any lessons dealing with writing laws to make it a crime to commit a crime. I'm not even sure what you would call this. Maybe she can name it the "Making Gun Crime Illegal-er, and This Time We Mean It, Act". It's not a real catchy title, but it would be pretty accurate.

 

[BobM]

I've always been puzzled by this logic. Unless I missed that day of law school, I don't recall any lessons dealing with writing laws to make it a crime to commit a crime. I'm not even sure what you would call this. Maybe she can name it the "Making Gun Crime Illegal-er, and This Time We Mean It, Act". It's not a real catchy title, but it would be pretty accurate.

Yes, she sounds redundant and very unoriginal in her logic or statements.
If actual costs came out of her own personal pockets she may change her parroting logic and tune?
Another fine swampy example of wasting more tax payers time and money?

 

[TidalWave]

I've always been puzzled by this logic. Unless I missed that day of law school, I don't recall any lessons dealing with writing laws to make it a crime to commit a crime. I'm not even sure what you would call this. Maybe she can name it the "Making Gun Crime Illegal-er, and This Time We Mean It, Act". It's not a real catchy title, but it would be pretty accurate.

As Keystone said, the pork has a lot to do with it.... Pork spending often cannot pass as stand alone legislation. It has to be camouflaged. Sometimes its a money making scam.