No one would pay $1300 for a RIA or Tisas...they're not priced that high. I bought and Iver Johnson (I believe they are made in the Philippines) long slide with fully adjustable target sights for just at $700 and the first 10 shots out of the gun after a good cleaning were almost in the same hole at 15 yards. That's with factory, White-box, Win-Western ball Ammo. Yes, Springfield has some offerings that can do the same thing, but for, again, $500(+) more. I buy a firearm for 1.) Accuracy 2.) Quality (It's hard to get accuracy without quality) and 3.) value. None of the guns I have are going to be put back up for sale, so re-sale value doesn't mean a rip to me. Stainless steel is all nice and purdie, but I know how to take care of and store a firearm so I'm not worried about rust. As for looks, the most important view of ANY gun to me is when I'm safely behind it. You're not really looking at the finish of the metal when you're squaring up your sights.
I do agree with what I believe Colt45 above was trying to say. I will not spend money on a polymer parts, striker fired handgun. If it doesn't have a hammer on the back of it, I don't like it. The technology of plastics/composites has come light years since the mid 80s, and I'm sure there are some truly accurate, quality made plastic pistols out there. But just not for me.
If I ever find a Springfield Loaded Range-master in 9mm for the same price I paid for a "Filipino" made long slide .45, I'd be glad to buy it. But it doesn't look like S/A is the slightest bit concerned about the consumer market constituency I'm in. With the discontinuance of the Range Master line and the emergence of this new campaign for the Emissary, along with other lines they are hyping, it looks like they are instead just casually stepping over and walking away.