Again respectfully, not sure why you have an issue which my posts. On the holster, I didn’t assume anything. You assume your problem of not having a range that allows folks to draw is my problem when it’s not. I simply referred to a course of fire that is relevant to gauge one’s abilities. If a range doesn’t allow drawing from a holster maybe you should find another range. Further more many take a CCW class to allow one to carry said gun around in a holster yet when they do a shooting part of their test they don’t allow anyone to draw from a holster what the heck is the point of the class? I know to fill a state requirementagain, you are "assuming" everywhere shooting for the holster is allowed.....it is not, at all 3 ranges i go to.
again, you are pretty much giving us LE information, over private citizens.
it just does not work that way.
as far as "justifiable" (at times) shooting in the back?
i'll try to remember to not do that here. if not only due to being told in Law class NOT to, but it'll carry over in civil court as well.
perhaps a "disclaimer" on your part like, "where this is allowed"...????
rather than to assume it IS allowed all over the place..???
I’d say Find a range that that does allow holster drawing or here’s an idea. Go to a Range Master (Tom Givens) First Person Safety (Lee Weems) Two Pillars (John Hearne) or other reputable class. That give one a lot more in-depth knowledges if when and more importantly when not to shoot!
As far as the LE vs Civilian shooting there are similarities more than you are admitting. Like assessing if a shot is even legal, warranted and where the real difference between a technical shooter (like competition) and the application shooter (real world assessment and not pointing a loaded firearm at innocent non participants)