powerboatr
Professional
listened to to both sides this morning as well as some justices actually asking intelligent questions
i would urge people to go listen on cspan, vice the talking heads
even the liberals asked some tough questions of both lawyers
very very educational
some things that caught my eye or ear
were the fact pres has to be 35 to be president , but does that mean he or she has to be 35 before the election or inauguration day?
technically he or she is not president until he or she is sworn in, so he or she could turn 35 at midnight the day of swearing in.
this was brought up a few times in circles
so does a state have authority to restrict a person from being ballot based on not being old enough prior to election??? NO
but somehow they want to restrict trump based on a FUTURE date. like he is tried for treason or insurrection prior to inauguration day, even if found guilty . he is not ineligible to be president until swearing in day at noon. NOT NOW, not next week as the round of statements went
colorado says he guilty of the Insurrection, even though no charges have been filed and no conviction of the FEDERAL crime.
but his attorney never brought that up
any who
great listen for 2 plus hours
www.c-span.org
i would urge people to go listen on cspan, vice the talking heads
even the liberals asked some tough questions of both lawyers
very very educational
some things that caught my eye or ear
were the fact pres has to be 35 to be president , but does that mean he or she has to be 35 before the election or inauguration day?
technically he or she is not president until he or she is sworn in, so he or she could turn 35 at midnight the day of swearing in.
this was brought up a few times in circles
so does a state have authority to restrict a person from being ballot based on not being old enough prior to election??? NO
but somehow they want to restrict trump based on a FUTURE date. like he is tried for treason or insurrection prior to inauguration day, even if found guilty . he is not ineligible to be president until swearing in day at noon. NOT NOW, not next week as the round of statements went
colorado says he guilty of the Insurrection, even though no charges have been filed and no conviction of the FEDERAL crime.
but his attorney never brought that up
any who
great listen for 2 plus hours
[Trump v. Anderson] Supreme Court Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in [Trump v. Anderson], a case on whether Colorado can exclude former President Donald Trump from its 2024 presidential primary ballot. The state's Supreme Court ruled him ineligible, citing that he violated the Constitution for his role in the January 6...
Last edited:
