testtest

The 21-Foot Rule Myth

Talyn said:
The title of this thread is...

THE 21-FOOT RULE MYTH​

BTW - If someone is coming at me with a knife in an aggressive manner within 21 ft. I will defend myself.
Click to expand...
But going by the article, depending on how you define aggressive, wouldn't that be justified? He's approaching you with a deadly weapon in such a way that I would assume a reasonable person would believe that when he gets closer to you he's going to use it.
 
Everyone has to make a decision on when to initiate a self-defense action, whether is a single assailant charging you with a weapon that can kill or seriously injure you or if it's multiple assailants with deadly weapons trying to surround, distract and assault you.
 
Talyn said:
Everyone has to make a decision on when to initiate a self-defense action, whether is a single assailant charging you with a weapon that can kill or seriously injure you or if it's multiple assailants with deadly weapons trying to surround, distract and assault you.
Click to expand...
I'm not trying to be argumentative. I feel like I came off like I was in some of my other posts in this discussion.

I realize that there is no accounting for what the district attorney or a jury is going to do but it seems to me like in both of the scenarios that you're describing a person would be justified in using deadly force.

Or at least at the very minimum threatening deadly force
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top