testtest

The PKM vs M240 Debate

Talyn

SAINT
Founding Member
A 7.62x51 PKM is a great combo. Would rather have it than a M249.

And the M240 is a great but heavy. medium MG.

The West emphasizes fire superiority, which must be established before engaging in maneuvers, serving as a support weapon for infantry. The PKM machine gun, while distributed as an individual weapon, actually serves as the squad automatic weapon within the infantry squad.


1741235805694.png
 
A 7.62x51 PKM is a great combo. Would rather have it than a M249.

And the M240 is a great but heavy. medium MG.

The West emphasizes fire superiority, which must be established before engaging in maneuvers, serving as a support weapon for infantry. The PKM machine gun, while distributed as an individual weapon, actually serves as the squad automatic weapon within the infantry squad.


View attachment 77077
Having humped the M60 as part of a 4 man MG team I can tell you that the M240B wasn’t a move up. Yes, it’s more reliable and you can easily mount optics on it. The problem is that it’s awkward to have to do IMT with. (Individual Movement Techniques).
a M249 SAW in 7.62mm like what the SEALS use would have been a much better option.
The main selling point for the M240 is its configuration options. Kits come with them to easily convert them to turret mounted mode, aircraft mode, etc
 
Back
Top