Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “The Story of the Legendary General George S. Patton” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/the-story-of-the-legendary-general-george-s-patton/.
That’s what I was going to mention. Don’t forget Douglas MacArthur, who, as Chief of Staff of the Army, changed into his service uniform so he could go down and lead the attack, not to mention carry it on across the river after the president ordered it halted.nice read BUT leaves out his involvement with the Bonus Army. He and Eisenhower lead an engagement against civilians in a camp in Washington DC. allegedly killing several and maiming dozens.
When will you come out with a book of some kind? You're a great writer and I read every of yours article I can find. Even a compilation of your essays on different subjects would be well received.Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “The Story of the Legendary General George S. Patton” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/the-story-of-the-legendary-general-george-s-patton/.
Those civilians were actually WWI veterans that were protesting lack of veteran benefits, and their protest had turned into more of a riot. They had also set up a large encampment near the capital building. Both Ike and Patton were ordered to help break it up. This was back in the early 1920's. Patton felt for the veterans, but at the same time he had to follow orders from his superiors. It was a low point in his career, but not of his making. Thank the politicians for that.nice read BUT leaves out his involvement with the Bonus Army. He and Eisenhower lead an engagement against civilians in a camp in Washington DC. allegedly killing several and maiming dozens.
None have led from the front, but the only one that comes close would be Gen. Norman Schwartzcoff.Thanks for the article. I have always been fascinated with General Patton at least since I first saw that George C Scott movie as a kid. Anyway, I have a question, of all the General officers that have served since WW2, who would you say has been the closest in terms of combat effectiveness to Patton? Setting aside politics and just getting down to a General that knew how to win a battle and advance, leading from the front so to speak. Does a General like that even exist anymore? Was it even true of Patton?
Lt. General Puller USMC. Promoted during the Korean War to BG and appointed Assistant Division Commander of the 1st Marine Division.None have led from the front, but the only one that comes close would be Gen. Norman Schwartzcoff.
Though the movie was good, it actually gave short shrift to Patton. The credits say it was based on Bradley's book, A Soldiers Story, and Patton: Ordeal and Triumph by Ladislas Farago. In reality, maybe 10 percent was taken from the book by Farago and the rest from Bradley's book. George C. Scott refused to accept the Oscar for Best Actor because he felt that the screenwriters and producers failed to grasp the complexities of the man and his abilities by largely ignoring Farago's book and other sources which Scott had studied.Thanks for the article. I have always been fascinated with General Patton at least since I first saw that George C Scott movie as a kid. Anyway, I have a question, of all the General officers that have served since WW2, who would you say has been the closest in terms of combat effectiveness to Patton? Setting aside politics and just getting down to a General that knew how to win a battle and advance, leading from the front so to speak. Does a General like that even exist anymore? Was it even true of Patton?
I would agree with you 100%. "Chesty" was one hell of a man and Marine! I based my reply on a high ranking general leading an army in combat. Not taking anything away from "Chesty" Puller, but for his service during WWII and Korea he was a LtCol. and Colonel, not a general officer leading an army.Lt. General Puller USMC. Promoted during the Korean War to BG and appointed Assistant Division Commander of the 1st Marine Division.
Which is why I mentioned he was a BG in Korea in 1951. Not commander of a field army for sure, but a GO during was nonetheless.I would agree with you 100%. "Chesty" was one hell of a man and Marine! I based my reply on a high ranking general leading an army in combat. Not taking anything away from "Chesty" Puller, but for his service during WWII and Korea he was a LtCol. and Colonel, not a general officer leading an army.
Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “The Story of the Legendary General George S. Patton” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/the-story-of-the-legendary-general-george-s-patton/.
Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “The Story of the Legendary General George S. Patton” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/the-story-of-the-legendary-general-george-s-patton/.
Need to read the book, 48 Hours to Hammelburg, by Charles Whiting. Patton sent men on a dangerous 60 mile mission to rescue American POWs, the only time he ever did so. This is because his son-in-law was believed to be held there. But the winners write the history books and for those who died on that mission wouldn't believe Patton was so wonderful to get them killed for his son-in-law.