Bassbob
Emissary
All that is correct - there is no legal requirement.
However.
Look at the demographic (ok...the LIKELY demographic) of all these first-time, panic-buyers. Terrified of guns. Knows nothing of guns (black is scary). Willfully - to this point - have BLOCKED any knowledge input about guns out of willful ignorance.
Now? They have them at home.
They spent the money, but have not done the research, nor acquired the knowledge, in order to be safe around their new purchases. These are not rocket science, but mistakes can be fatal. Easily. While these folks may not need to take a "safety course", they need to do more than "fill the clip" and throw it in a drawer, waiting for the zombies to attack.
The constitution doesn't require training...but Darwin does. And I suspect we're going to see a flood of Darwin Award-winners this coming season. And as we all know...firearm accidents will come back on us responsible owners tenfold in the press - "SEE??? We TOLD you.... Guns are BAD!! mmmkay....."
I’m guessing you’re overreacting. Personally I think it’s a good thing. People who have decided having guns for self defense are less likely to vote for politicians who want to ban them.
I wouldn’t have a problem lifting ALL restrictions on firearms. Felons and nut jobs can get them already anyway. Laws don’t change that.