I'm only going to make one response to the recent "not an attack" sting of posts; there will not be any replies. A large group of nuts chanting "stop the steal," "hang Pence," and who had members among them that stated their intent to kill Nancy Pelosi battered in windows and doors, killed a cop, stole government property, smeared literal **** on the walls, went on video saying they intended a revolution while chanting "1776," put over 100 cops in the hospital, and made comments such as "next time we come back with 30,000 guns. That was most definitely an attack and, since they intended to interrupt the business of government through violence, an insurrection.
The people claiming the election was stolen had over 60 chances to produce actual evidence in a court of law but never did it. That's because there are actual consequences to lying to a federal judge, unlike when on TV standing in front of a law and garden shop. The ONLY reason there are questions is because trump, who said years ago that the only way he loses is if the vote was rigged, kept saying the vote was rigged in defiance of all evidence and his toadies went along with it. There was no actual evidence.
January 6 wasn't just a group of frustrated people. They went to the Capitol with true malice, caused death and destruction and sought to cause more, and they did it based on a lie. To believe the trump narrative you have to willfully ignore or discredit all federal judges including trump appointees, republican secretaries of state and governors, trumps own administration and attorney general, and all media reporting from everyone to the left of OAN, including Fox News and believe the unsubstantiated claims of someone who has a pathological inability to ever admit he lost at anything.