I read the article about this on Military Times. Seemed like a Great idea but now I’m thinking differently if the ships are floating pieces of crapBoth variants of the LCS are maintenace hogs and have multiple defective issues, and were/are a horrible waste of USD.
The LCS program is just one of the massive mistakes that the USN made during the last 30 yrs.
It’s a Damned shame.I was being sarcastic…these ship classes should never been built. Some Admirals fevered imagination, I bet.
If you are referring to the Sgt. York, then yes I remember DIVADs. There was a time when fond of copying Soviet designs in this case the ZSU-23-4. So they decided to try and put a big turret on an M-48A5 chassis, try and integrate radar fire control with an F-16 radar and Bofors 40mm guns (I think). After all of those sunk costs they cancelled it thank goodness. BTW, I've been up close to the ZSU-23-4 and it's a piece of junk that broke down all the time.When one realizes that many military "solutions" (think DIVADs if you're old enough) were never designed to work or solve a solution but rather to spend large amounts of money with distribution to many hands, you begin to understand empires.![]()
I remember seeing that thing at a outdoor military museum displayIf you are referring to the Sgt. York, then yes I remember DIVADs. There was a time when fond of copying Soviet designs in this case the ZSU-23-4. So they decided to try and put a big turret on an M-48A5 chassis, try and integrate radar fire control with an F-16 radar and Bofors 40mm guns (I think). After all of those sunk costs they cancelled it thank goodness. BTW, I've been up close to the ZSU-23-4 and it's a piece of junk that broke down all the time.
Another example is the improved TOW vehicle meant as a copy of the BRDM-ATGM. Fort Knox actually put together the first prototypes which actually worked. Then big Army got a hold of it and proceeded to develop a so-so official version. Hint to the developers. Don't reverse engineer Soviet/Russian equipment.
I’ll settle for horseback agents and 21’ dual outboard boats. It’s more then Biden ever usedI am sure a destroyer can sustain longer patrols than littoral ships and carry some gee whiz long range surveillance gear
I almost forgot about this one. It actually was a good idea. I watched 4 of them in the ground support role light up a group of “Objectives”. It was just before dawn and Boy was that One Hell Of a Light ShowIf you are referring to the Sgt. York, then yes I remember DIVADs. There was a time when fond of copying Soviet designs in this case the ZSU-23-4. So they decided to try and put a big turret on an M-48A5 chassis, try and integrate radar fire control with an F-16 radar and Bofors 40mm guns (I think). After all of those sunk costs they cancelled it thank goodness. BTW, I've been up close to the ZSU-23-4 and it's a piece of junk that broke down all the time.
Another example is the improved TOW vehicle meant as a copy of the BRDM-ATGM. Fort Knox actually put together the first prototypes which actually worked. Then big Army got a hold of it and proceeded to develop a so-so official version. Hint to the developers. Don't reverse engineer Soviet/Russian equipment.
Is that a vulcan on there?I almost forgot about this one. It actually was a good idea. I watched 4 of them in the ground support role light up a group of “Objectives”. It was just before dawn and Boy was that One Hell Of a Light Show![]()
Sure isIs that a vulcan on there?
Sure is![]()
Don’t forget all the goofy uniform changes the Army has made; fatigues and dress. And the Navy’s blueberries.I almost forgot about this one. It actually was a good idea. I watched 4 of them in the ground support role light up a group of “Objectives”. It was just before dawn and Boy was that One Hell Of a Light Show![]()