testtest

WEED

jschmidt said:
By the way, almost nobody (about 2% and virtually all with a companion crime. That's about 1 in 50 that get charged under this section of the law. So it would be a lie to say he's being "treated like everyone else."
And "addicted to crack" is not a medical or scientific term.
Click to expand...
You'll have to take that up with Merrick Garland. Besides, that's just a political smokescreen for the big guy. And I'm guessing Hunter would rather deal with the gun charge than to be tried for the treason and fraud he should be charged with, so he's got that going for him.

They should be charging his sister in law/girlfriend with a crime though. I think throwing a firearm in a trash can is probably illegal.
 
Bassbob said:
You'll have to take that up with Merrick Garland. Besides, that's just a political smokescreen for the big guy. And I'm guessing Hunter would rather deal with the gun charge than to be tried for the treason and fraud he should be charged with, so he's got that going for him.

They should be charging his sister in law/girlfriend with a crime though. I think throwing a firearm in a trash can is probably illegal.
Click to expand...
Yep. You're guessing. 😉 For one thing, that's not what legal treason is. Even if he did the worst you imagine it wouldn't be (legal) treason.

And to the extent he was treated unfairly, that's down to the Independent Special Prosecutor. Garland correctly appointed one, but somehow I suspect he didn't know the prosecutor would treat him uncharistically harsly. My only point, however, was that no one gets charged for this.

I think the rest is air, but you never know. We'll see.
 
Last edited:
jschmidt said:
Yep. You're guessing. 😉 For one thing, that's not what legal treason is. Even if he did the worst you imagine it wouldn't be (legal) treason.

And to the extent he was treated unfairly, that's down to the Independent Special Prosecutor. Garland correctly appointed one, but somehow I suspect he didn't know the prosecutor would treat him uncharistically harsly. My only point, however, was that no one gets charged for this.

I think the rest is air, but you never know. We'll see.
Click to expand...
You don't think selling influence to Chinese is treason ?
 
The discussion surrounding cannabis legalization and its implications on gun ownership rights is multifaceted and evolving. While some states have legalized recreational cannabis, the federal government's stance remains a significant factor, particularly concerning firearms regulations enforced by the ATF. This intersection raises questions about individual rights, public safety, and the need for comprehensive legal reforms.As attitudes towards medical cannabis continue to shift and legislation evolves, it's crucial for policymakers and advocates to address these complexities to ensure fair and equitable treatment for all individuals.
 
I don't know about you guys, but I'm staying away from weed. I think it's too dangerous and not worth it.

if i want to smoke something on vacation for example or at a party i go and get a malboro gold or a Crave Max 2500 from the store and that's it.
 
Awful lot of obsession of "rules".

The Liberatarian in me isn't fond of rules because of rules...

Surprised to see so many people finding reasons or conditions to impinge or restrict people's gun rights.
 
Last edited:
last2brake said:
Awful lot of obsession of "rules".

The Liberatarian in me isn't fond of rules because of rules...

Surprised to see so many people finding reasons or conditions to impinge or restrict people's gun rights.
Click to expand...
Oh, they don't stop at that. Telling others what they can or cannot do is the new rule of the day.
 
One of my parents passed a few years ago in her mid 70's. She battled Parkinson's and related Dementia for over a decade. My father who was in his 80's and myself were primary caregivers. I cannot imagine adding her being "high" to the equation. Perhaps I am not educated on the subject, but I think it would have only added to her constant confusion and fear.
Does anyone really think the voter lines here in NE Florida were filled with people suffering from Parkinson's or Dementia? At best it was thier caregivers in an effort to sedate them, at worst it was others trying to add sympathetic aspect to "the cause". That's my take for what it's worth.
 
Some of the post' here are very telling. It inspires me (as it should you) to know who is on your indoor range before booking a lane. Those who have such distain for federal law, the need for "rules" and the like. Will they follow safety regs on range, or will they shoot me in the leg press checking thier gun the cool way in front of thier phone?
 
Jekylmeister said:
I wish they'd get on with it, legalize it, tax & regulate it, and clear a lot of criminal records, already. Too much time and effort being spent on something that is going away.
Click to expand...
The fact that some think pot should be legal is irrelevant, the point is the criminal records that you want cleared are a result of breaking existing law. It is simple, if you do not want a criminal record, do not break the law. Do I think recreational use should be illegal? No, same regs as alcohol is good by me. A country without laws.... well you know the rest. Peace.
 
Last edited:
SL66 said:
Some of the post' here are very telling. It inspires me (as it should you) to know who is on your indoor range before booking a lane. Those who have such distain for federal law, the need for "rules" and the like. Will they follow safety regs on range, or will they shoot me in the leg press checking thier gun the cool way in front of thier phone?
Click to expand...
Would you have followed the rules if Kamala banned guns ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top