testtest

Why introduce the SA 35 if 1911 9mm exists ?

Actually the original Browning Hi-Power and subsequent replicas do have a barrel bushing.

Steve Camp wrote in his FAQ Section; What is the difference between Mk II and Mk III Hi Powers. Quote: The non-removable bushing extends out slightly more than on Mk III pistols. Classic Hi Powers made from the mid-70's until the Mk II was introduced did as well.

www.hipowersandhandguns.com/What%20are%20the%20differences%20between%20the%20Mk%20II%20and%20Mk%20III.htm

Earlier C& T series BHPs had a flusher bushing than a BHP Mk.II & the SA-35 is abit of a C/T replica. You can see the bushing in this pic.

1656295510770.png


The original FN/Browning bushing has a very fine thread and was soldered in place inside the slide. One can assume the Non-USA replicas do the same but that would require more research.

However, with the SA-35 BHSS discovered the SA-35 bushing is also threaded, but discovered that the bushing was secured by some sort of locktite.

When they did work to replace the front sight they had to applied heat to that end of the slide and discovered a residue that started bubbling up from the front site area. All that is documented in their series of evaluation videos.

BHSS fixes that when they get SA-35's in for work that requires a changed sight.

BTW - Regarding the OPs question, diversty is the spice of life so while there were non-USA BHP replicas SA decided to dive into that market need by creating their own vision of the BHP.
 
Last edited:
Actually the original Browning Hi-Power and subesequent replicas do have abarrel bushing,

The original FN/Browning bushing has a very fine thread and was soldered in place inside the slide. One can assume the Non-USA replicas do the same but that would require more research.
I should have been more clear on the barrel bushing, I should have said it’s a non removable type, not like the one on the 1911, my mistake
 
I would consider the original BHP bushings as non-removeable since they were soldered in, but since the SA-35 bushing appears to be locktited in it may be removeable.

But it may be some work to unscrew it once the locktite was melted/burned off, but nonetheless the bushing has to be screwed in with some sort of tool, and torqued in.
 
I dont see how you can tell a difference in operation if they are both single action.
Could it be trigger feel ? They weigh similar the recoil has to be similar shooting the same ammo.
Sights ? I doubt that could be a big difference. So it has to boil down to no grip safety and increased
capacity mags.
The trigger is completely different in operation; the straight-back press of the 1911 vs the pivoting press of the BHP.

They are as much “essentially the same” as a AK47 and a M1 Garand.
 
I dont see how you can tell a difference in operation if they are both single action.
Could it be trigger feel ? They weigh similar the recoil has to be similar shooting the same ammo.
Sights ? I doubt that could be a big difference. So it has to boil down to no grip safety and increased
capacity mags.
This is like saying I don’t see how you can tell a difference between a Glock and a Sig P320. Or a Sig 226 and 1911. Or even 1911s from different gun makers. Every gun has its own personality, it own peculiarities, it’s own nuances. That’s what makes shooting so enjoyable. It’s more than point your gun at the target, it’s how it feels, how it makes you feel. We’ve all got at least one gun that is THE gun. The one that makes us feel telepathically connected. As it happens I fired a Browning High Power today for the second time and put 10 rounds into 1 ragged hole. It felt tight and easy to shoot, but it also felt kind of small and certainly did not feel anything like a 9mm 1911.
 
Two different handguns that share the influence of JMB.



 
Back
Top