And here again is the new 35-rounder, with the 4.5-inch, full-frame gun:
And again for those who would suggest that perhaps with the slide on, it's not going to be a problem, I'd recall the last two pictures that I posted in post #19 above (https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum/threads/xdm-9mm-35-rd-mag-initial-report.10081/#post-134152), and also submit the following additional -
As you can see in this image, my thumb nail and tip are both quite blanched from the force that I'm exhibiting to hold down the slide-stop/release. You'll note just how far the lip of the magazine has made it past the bottom edge of the ejector body (would you believe that just moments before picture captured, the entire ejector body was under the plane formed by the top of the magazine feed lips?).
Once again, for those who question my intentions with these posts, please understand that I am -NOT- here to troll. I hope that my time and posts here on this Forum as well as on XD-Talk make clear that I am not that type of member. For those who would forgo that kind of homework and insist that I am, I'd simply ask them to again read my earlier reply in this thread - https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum/threads/xdm-9mm-35-rd-mag-initial-report.10081/#post-132998 ).
I simply want to look at this concern - that of over insertion damage to the ejector ( https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum...nd-extended-magazine.10037/page-2#post-131897 ), in-relation to the new (as they exist today) original equipment, Springfield Armory 35-round magazines for the XDm, in an objective manner.
And again for those who would suggest that perhaps with the slide on, it's not going to be a problem, I'd recall the last two pictures that I posted in post #19 above (https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum/threads/xdm-9mm-35-rd-mag-initial-report.10081/#post-134152), and also submit the following additional -
As you can see in this image, my thumb nail and tip are both quite blanched from the force that I'm exhibiting to hold down the slide-stop/release. You'll note just how far the lip of the magazine has made it past the bottom edge of the ejector body (would you believe that just moments before picture captured, the entire ejector body was under the plane formed by the top of the magazine feed lips?).
Once again, for those who question my intentions with these posts, please understand that I am -NOT- here to troll. I hope that my time and posts here on this Forum as well as on XD-Talk make clear that I am not that type of member. For those who would forgo that kind of homework and insist that I am, I'd simply ask them to again read my earlier reply in this thread - https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum/threads/xdm-9mm-35-rd-mag-initial-report.10081/#post-132998 ).
I simply want to look at this concern - that of over insertion damage to the ejector ( https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum...nd-extended-magazine.10037/page-2#post-131897 ), in-relation to the new (as they exist today) original equipment, Springfield Armory 35-round magazines for the XDm, in an objective manner.